KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/12085
Title: | COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHYSIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF CHIRONJI (Buchanania lanzan) gum AND BAHERA (Terminalia bellerica) gum |
Other Titles: | Not Available |
Authors: | Anamika Thakur MZ Siddiqui Ranjit Singh Niranjan Prasad |
ICAR Data Use Licennce: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/PDF/ICAR_Data_Use_Licence.pdf |
Author's Affiliated institute: | ICAR::Indian Institute of Natural Resins and Gums |
Published/ Complete Date: | 2018-08-15 |
Project Code: | 3.2.026 |
Keywords: | Chironji gum Bahera gum Physicochemical properties |
Publisher: | Dr. Kiran Abasaheb More |
Citation: | Anamika Thakur, MZ Siddiqui, Ranjit Singh, Niranjan Prasad. 2018. Comparative Study of Physiochemical properties of Chironji (Buchanania lanzan) gum and Bahera (Terminalia bellerica) gum. Multilogic in Science. VIII (C): 138-140 |
Series/Report no.: | VIII;C |
Abstract/Description: | Manyexudate gums fromplants have been discovered by Scientists in the past few years. These are natural gums which are secreted by plants and solidify when exposed to air and sunlight. These gums vary in properties showing their diverse use. Thus, a comparative study was done by identifying various physiochemical properties of Chironji and Bahera gum. The moisture content of Chironji gum was11.82%while that of Bahera gum was found to be 12.64%. Ash content in Bahera gum was approximately 15 times higher than that of Chironji gum. Protein content in Chironji gum and Bahera gum was found to be 1.12% and 0.19%, respectively.Fat content of Chironji gum was 0.02% while that of Bahera gum was 0.41%. The carbohydrate content in Bahera gum is less than that of Chironji gum.The angle of repose obtained for Chironji and Bahera gums was 26.35 and 29.57, respectively. The bulk density of Bahera gum was found to be comparatively lesser than Chironji gum. Similarly, compressibility of Chironji gum was higher than Bahera gum.The Hausner index of Bahera gum was lower than Chironji gum. |
Description: | Not Available |
ISSN: | 2277-7601 |
Type(s) of content: | Research Paper |
Sponsors: | ICAR |
Language: | English |
Name of Journal: | MULTILOGIC IN SCIENCE |
Volume No.: | VIII (C) |
Page Number: | 138-139 |
Name of the Division/Regional Station: | Processing and Product Development Division |
Source, DOI or any other URL: | Not Available |
URI: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/12085 |
Appears in Collections: | AEng-IINRG-Publication |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
COMPARATIV636694949046561571.pdf | 265.14 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.