KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/47532
Title: | Evaluation of sampling gear for demersal resource surveys |
Other Titles: | Not Available |
Authors: | Boopendranath, M.R. Panicker, P.A. Kakati, V.S. Raje, S.G. |
Author's Affiliated institute: | ICAR::Central Institute of Fisheries Technology |
Published/ Complete Date: | 1996-01-01 |
Project Code: | Not Available |
Keywords: | Sampling gear Demersal trawls |
Publisher: | Department of Ocean Development, New Delhi |
Citation: | Boopendranath, M.R. et al. (1996). Evaluation of sampling gear for demersal resource surveys. In : Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scientific Results of FORV Sagar Sampada . Pillai, V.K. et. Al (Eds.), pp 469-476, Department of Ocean Development, New Delhi. |
Series/Report no.: | Not Available; |
Abstract/Description: | The three demersal trawls evaluated were 38 m HSDT-II, indigenously developed by CIFT for deep sea fishing in Indian EEZ; and two imported designs, viz., 45.6 m Expo model demersal trawl and 50 m fish trawl operated from vessels of FSI and IFP, respectively. Vertical opening at trawl mouth was heighest for 50 m fish trawl (3.2 m), followed by Expo model demersal trawl (2.5 m) and 38 m HSDT-II (2.2 m), due to differences in overall dimensions and design features. Estimate of horizontal opening between otter boards was highest for 38 m HSDT-II probably due to low drag of the gear, followed by 45.6 m and 50 m trawls. Lowest catch per unit effort obtained by 38 m HSDT_II is presumably due to smaller dimensions of the gear, larger codend mesh size and difference in ground ring, in addition to chance factors. However, 38 m HSDT-II scores on several features desirable in demersal sampling gear such as simplicity in design and construction, ease of operation; lower twine surface area and drag; and ground ring suitable for wider range of bottom conditions. Modifications to make it more effective while sampling for crustaceans and small sized finish components are described. |
Description: | Not Available |
ISSN: | Not Available |
Type(s) of content: | Proceedings |
Sponsors: | Not Available |
Language: | English |
Name of Journal: | Not Available |
Volume No.: | Not Available |
Page Number: | 469-476 |
Name of the Division/Regional Station: | Not Available |
Source, DOI or any other URL: | Not Available |
URI: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/47532 |
Appears in Collections: | FS-CIFT-Publication |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluation of sampling gear for demersal resource surveys.pdf | 304.84 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.