KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/58819
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | S. Senthil Vinayagam | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | K. Akhila | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | A. Mahesh | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-19T06:54:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-19T06:54:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-20 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | S. Senthil Vinayagam, K. Akhila and A. Mahesh (2020). Evaluation of Learning Process in Distance Education. International Journal of Education & Management Studies, 10(3), 308-311. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2231-5632-e-2321-3671 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/58819 | - |
dc.description | Not Available | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Emerging technologies hold promise for improvement of student achievement and teaching quality. The paper has been examined to evaluate the learning process of 58 nominated faculty of Agriculture Universities (AUs) through online and offline mode by using “Exploratory” type of research design. Data collected by using 'questionnaires' as a data collection tool. To display patterns of evaluating performance in the form of quantitative data, the statistical technique called “Box plot technique” was applied. This technique splits the data set into four quartiles based on the marks they obtained. To study difference between the evaluation pattern of offline and online learning process, t-test was employed. The mean for offline and online learners was 60.6 and 63.3, whereas variance of offline and online learners was 57.4 and 103.7 respectively. The 't' calculated value was less than 't' table value. So it can be deduced that offline learners were non-significant with online learners in case of overall performance. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Not Available | en_US |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | International Journal of Education & Management Studies | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Not Available; | - |
dc.subject | performance evaluation, online mode, offline mode, learning process | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of Learning Process in Distance Education | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Not Available | en_US |
dc.type | Research Paper | en_US |
dc.publication.projectcode | Not Available | en_US |
dc.publication.journalname | International Journal of Education and Management Studies | en_US |
dc.publication.volumeno | 10 (3) | en_US |
dc.publication.pagenumber | 308-311 | en_US |
dc.publication.divisionUnit | Not Available | en_US |
dc.publication.sourceUrl | Not Available | en_US |
dc.publication.authorAffiliation | ICAR::National Academy of Agricultural Research and Management | en_US |
dc.publication.authorAffiliation | ICAR::National Academy of Agricultural Research and Management | en_US |
dc.publication.authorAffiliation | ICAR::National Academy of Agricultural Research and Management | en_US |
dc.ICARdataUseLicence | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/PDF/ICAR_Data_Use_Licence.pdf | en_US |
dc.publication.naasrating | 4.79 | en_US |
dc.publication.naasrating | Not Available | - |
Appears in Collections: | AEdu-NAARM-Publication |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.