KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/64356
Title: | Cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries |
Other Titles: | Not Available |
Authors: | Herrera,Miguel Ilangakoon,Anoukchika D Koya,Mohammed Moazzam Khan,Muhammad Mustika,Putu L Sutaria,Dipani N Anderson,Charles A |
ICAR Data Use Licennce: | Not Available |
Author's Affiliated institute: | Not Available |
Published/ Complete Date: | 2020 |
Project Code: | Not Available |
Keywords: | Bycatch Gillnet Driftnet Dolphin |
Publisher: | Not Available |
Citation: | Not Available |
Series/Report no.: | Not Available |
Abstract/Description: | Pelagic gillnet (driftnet) fisheries account for some 34% of Indian Ocean tuna catches. We combined published results from 10 bycatch sampling programmes (1981−2016) in Australia, Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan to estimate bycatch rates for cetaceans across all Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries. Estimated cetacean bycatch peaked at almost 100 000 ind. yr−1 during 2004−2006, but has declined by over 15% since then, despite an increase in tuna gillnet fishing effort. These fisheries caught an estimated cumulative total of 4.1 million small cetaceans between 1950 and 2018. These bycatch estimates take little or no account of cetaceans caught by gillnet but not landed, of delayed mortality or sub-lethal impacts on cetaceans (especially whales) that escape from gillnets, of mortality associated with ghost nets, of harpoon catches made from gillnetters, or of mortality from other tuna fisheries. Total cetacean mortality from Indian Ocean tuna fisheries may therefore be substantially higher than estimated here. Declining cetacean bycatch rates suggest that such levels of mortality are not sustainable. Indeed, mean small cetacean abundance may currently be 13% of pre-fishery levels. None of these estimates are precise, but they do demonstrate the likely order of magnitude of the issue. Countries with the largest current gillnet catches of tuna, and thus the ones likely to have the largest cetacean bycatch are (in order): Iran, Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Oman, Yemen, UAE and Tanzania. These 9 countries together may account for roughly 96% of all cetacean bycatch from tuna gillnet fisheries across the Indian Ocean. |
Description: | Not Available |
ISSN: | Not Available |
Type(s) of content: | Article |
Sponsors: | Not Available |
Language: | English |
Name of Journal: | Endangered Species Research |
Volume No.: | 41 |
Page Number: | 39-53 |
Name of the Division/Regional Station: | Not Available |
Source, DOI or any other URL: | https://www.int-res.com/articles/esr2020/41/n041p039.pdf http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/14046/1/Endangered Species Research_2020_Cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries_Mohamed Koya.pdf |
URI: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/64356 |
Appears in Collections: | FS-CMFRI-Publication |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.