KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/19445
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Monika A. Joshi | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Divya Aggarwal | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Archana Sanyal | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-14T07:17:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-14T07:17:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-12-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 0 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | Not Available | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/19445 | - |
dc.description | Not Available | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Thirty three genotypes of chickpea including 9 kabuli and 24 desi types were evaluated for distinctiveness based on 13 qualitative and 7 quantitative morphological DUS descriptors. In desi type, only 4 traits were polymorphic whereas, in kabuli type, only 3 were polymorphic. Identification profiles were generated on the basis of grouping and essential characters prescribed by DUS Guidelines of PPV & FR Authority. However, out of twenty four desi genotypes, distinct profiles could be created only for sixteen varieties and in kabuli type, only three out of nine genotypes could be singled out individually. Image analysis using scanned images of flowers of desi types successfully complemented the morphological descriptors to establish genotypic identity based on differences in the petal colour intensity and venation pattern. Genetic parameters for all the quantitative traits revealed less environmental influence on the characters expression thus, signifying their utility in the varietal characterization. Seven agro-morphological traits were used to assess the variability using Ward’s Minimum Variance Cluster Analysis. Thirty three cultivars from both types were grouped into four cluster each, however, none of the clusters contained genotypes with all the desirable traits, which could be directly selected and utilized. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Not Available | en_US |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | Not Available | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Not Available; | - |
dc.subject | Chickpea | en_US |
dc.subject | Distinctiveness | en_US |
dc.subject | Essential characters | en_US |
dc.subject | Grouping characters | en_US |
dc.subject | Image analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Morphological descriptors | en_US |
dc.title | Cultivar identification and diversity analysis based on morphological descriptors and image analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Not Available | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.publication.projectcode | Not Available | en_US |
dc.publication.journalname | Legume Research | en_US |
dc.publication.volumeno | Not Available | en_US |
dc.publication.pagenumber | Not Available | en_US |
dc.publication.divisionUnit | Division of Seed Science and Technology | en_US |
dc.publication.sourceUrl | DOI:10.18805/lr.v0i0.7839 | en_US |
dc.publication.authorAffiliation | ICAR::Indian Agricultural Research Institute | en_US |
dc.ICARdataUseLicence | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/PDF/ICAR_Data_Use_Licence.pdf | en_US |
dc.publication.naasrating | 6.53 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | NRM-CAZRI-Publication |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.