KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/43064
Title: | Energy budgeting, data envelopment analysis and carbon footprint of rice production system: a case study from puddle transplanted rice and direct-seeded rice system of Karnataka, India. |
Other Titles: | Not Available |
Authors: | Basavalingaiah K Ramesha YM Paramesh V Rajanna GA Jat SL Dhar S Gaddi AK Girisha HC Yogesh GS Raveesha S Roopa TK Shashidhar KS Kumar B El-Ansary EO Elansary H |
ICAR Data Use Licennce: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/PDF/ICAR_Data_Use_Licence.pdf |
Author's Affiliated institute: | ICAR::Indian Agricultural Research Institute |
Published/ Complete Date: | 2020-08-10 |
Project Code: | Not Available |
Keywords: | energy efficiency; carbon sustainability; greenhouse gas; rice; technical efficiency |
Publisher: | MDPI |
Citation: | Not Available |
Series/Report no.: | Not Available; |
Abstract/Description: | The energy consumption pattern and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission of any rice production system is important to know the sustainability of varied cultivation and establishment technique. This study was conducted to determine the energy use pattern, GHG emission and efficiency of rice farms in puddled transplanted (PTR, rainfed) and direct-seeded rice (DSR, irrigated) production systems in Karnataka, India. The energy indices and GHG emission of different input and output in a rice production system were assessed by using energy and carbon equivalence. The efficiency of PTR and DSR farms were identified using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and energy optimization was ascertained. The key finding was excessive use of non-renewable energy inputs was observed for the PTR (92.4%) compare to DSR (60.3%) methods. The higher energy use efficiency (7.3), energy productivity (0.3 kg MJ−1) and energy profitability (6.3) were mainly attributed to the large decrease in energy inputs under DSR. The DEA showed efficiency for 26 PTR farms in comparison for 87 DSR farms. The mean technical efficiency value highlighted the scope for saving energy by 6% and 2% in PTR and DSR, respectively and showed an economic reduction of $405.5/ha with PTR versus $163.3/ha with the DSR method if these inefficient farms perform efficiently. The GHG emissions revealed that the total emissions for PTR versus DSR production caused by on-farm emissions were 86% and 65%, respectively. The DSR method also had a higher carbon efficiency ratio and carbon sustainability index (10.1 and 9.1, respectively). Thus, adoption of DSR method is imperative for reduction of energy consumption and GHG emissions to achieve the carbon sustainability. |
Description: | Not Available |
ISSN: | Not Available |
Type(s) of content: | Research Paper |
Sponsors: | Not Available |
Language: | English |
Name of Journal: | Sustainability |
NAAS Rating: | 8.58 |
Volume No.: | 12 |
Page Number: | 6439 |
Name of the Division/Regional Station: | Not Available |
Source, DOI or any other URL: | doi:10.3390/su12166439 |
URI: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/43064 |
Appears in Collections: | CS-IIMR-Publication |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.