Sorption of sulfuryl fluoride by food commodities.
IR@CSIR-CFTRI
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Relation |
http://ir.cftri.com/1796/
PMS-01-08 |
|
Title |
Sorption of sulfuryl fluoride by food commodities.
|
|
Creator |
Sriranjini, Venkata Rao
Rajendran, S. |
|
Subject |
05 Insect/Pest Control
|
|
Description |
BACKGROUND: The use of sulfuryl fluoride, a structural fumigant for termite and woodborer control, has recently been expanded to treating stored food commodities and food facilities. There is, however, a lack of data on the sorption of sulfuryl fluoride by food commodities. Knowledge about sorption is important in the context of effective treatment and residues.RESULTS: When sulfuryl fluoride was applied at a dose of 50 g m(-3) to various food commodities (total 68) with 300 g per replicate in 0.75 L gas wash bottles (fumigation chambers) at 25 +/- 1 degrees C, in most cases (81%) the gas concentrations in the free space of the commodities exceeded 50 g m(-3) (range 51-80 g m(-3)) at the end of 24 h exposure. In chambers without the substrate, an average concentration of 49.7 g m(-3) was recorded. About 54% of the commodities showed low-level ( 50%). The latter include white oats (terminal gas concentration 17.8 g m(-3)), some of the decorticated split pulses (24.0-29.3 g m(-3)), chickpea flour (26.3 g m(-3)), dried ginger (29.0 g m(-3)), refined wheat flour (30.3 g m(-3)) and coriander powder (40.5 g m(-3)). In unfumigated control commodities, owing to interfering volatiles, Fumiscope((R)) readings in the range 0-13 were noted.CONCLUSION: Sulfuryl fluoride has the advantage of a low or moderate level of sorption with the majority of the food commodities. Copyright (c) 2008 Society of Chemical Industry.
|
|
Date |
2008
|
|
Type |
Article
PeerReviewed |
|
Format |
application/pdf
|
|
Language |
en
|
|
Rights |
—
|
|
Identifier |
http://ir.cftri.com/1796/1/Pest_Manag_Sci_64_873%E2%80%93879_%282008%29.pdf
Sriranjini, Venkata Rao and Rajendran, S. (2008) Sorption of sulfuryl fluoride by food commodities. Pest Management Science, 64 (8). pp. 873-9. ISSN 1526-498X |
|