KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/15103
Title: | Energy conservation and greenhouse gas mitigation under different production systems in rice cultivation |
Other Titles: | Not Available |
Authors: | V.P. Chaudhary, K.K. Singh, Pratibha G. Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Shamim M., Srinivas I. and Anurag Patel |
ICAR Data Use Licennce: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/PDF/ICAR_Data_Use_Licence.pdf |
Author's Affiliated institute: | ICAR::Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research ICAR::Central Research Institute of Dryland Agriculture ICAR::Indian Agricultural Research Institute |
Published/ Complete Date: | 2017-01-01 |
Project Code: | Not Available |
Keywords: | Energy use efficiency Specific energy Input and output energy Greenhouse gas emission Global warming potential Carbon input |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Citation: | Chaudhary, V. P., Singh, K.K., Pratibha, Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Shamim, G. M., Srinivas, I. and Patel, A. 2017. |
Series/Report no.: | Not Available; |
Abstract/Description: | Identification of a suitable cultivation method with low energy use, GWP and high productivity is the need of the hour. A 16-year old field study in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) with different methods of rice cultivation viz., zero tillage (ZT), happy turbo seeder (HTS), bed planting (BP), reduced tillage (RT), conventional sowing (CS), direct sowing (DS), broadcast method of sowing (BS), manual transplanting (HT) and selected transplanting methods like, manual transplanter (MT) and mechanical transplanter (MaT) was used to evaluate the energy input and GWP. HT method of rice cultivation recorded higher energy use than ZT, HTS, BP, RT, CS, DS and BS methods, respectively. Whereas HTS method recorded highest net grain energy (NEg) and this was followed by ZT and MaT, The PTR method recorded 61e66% higher GWP compared with direct sown unpuddled method of rice cultivation. Among direct sown unpuddled methods of rice cultivation, HTS, BP, RT and ZT had lower GWP than farmers' practice. MaT recorded higher carbon output than ZT, HTS, BP, RT, CS, DS and BS methods. The study indicated that direct seeded method of rice cultivation is energy efficient with lower GWP and thus may be recommended. |
Description: | Not Available |
ISSN: | Not Available |
Type(s) of content: | Research Paper |
Sponsors: | Not Available |
Language: | English |
Name of Journal: | Energy |
NAAS Rating: | 12.08 |
Volume No.: | 130 |
Page Number: | 307-317 |
Name of the Division/Regional Station: | Not Available |
Source, DOI or any other URL: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.131 |
URI: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/15103 |
Appears in Collections: | NRM-IIFSR-Publication |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
energyrice.pdf | 475.73 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.