Evaluation of straw and polythene mulch for enhancing productivity of irrigated summer groundnut

Abstract

In Vertisols of the semi-arid tropics lack of optimum soil water and low soil temperature (<18 °C) during germination, and high soil temperature (>37 °C) during pod development stage has been a major barrier to realizing yield potential of summer groundnut. Seven field experiments (comparing straw with polythene, 50 μm gauge mulch, duration of retention of polythene mulch, testing the combined effect of straw and polythene mulch, N management in straw mulch and field demonstration) were carried out from 1992 to 1999 in a sequence to identify a suitable mulch material, which was socially and economically acceptable and could overcome soil water and soil temperature related problems for summer groundnut. In general, straw mulch (wheat or paddy) produced more pod (17–24%) and haulm yields (16%) of groundnut than polythene mulch (black or transparent) and no mulch because of favourable soil water and soil temperature, earlier seedling emergences, more flower and mature pods numbers, lower bulk density and less weeds. We observed that groundnut plants showed N deficiency under wheat straw mulch at the early stage (up to 60 days after sowing). However, towards maturity N deficiency occurred at the early stage had no significant negative impact on pod yield of groundnut because the plants recovered N deficiency and had greater chlorophyll content and pod yield. This is presumed to be associated with bio-availability of macro and micronutrient during decomposition of organic mulch. The pod yield of groundnut under black polythene was higher than under transparent polythene. The polythene mulch increased soil temperature by 4–5 °C through out the crop growth (germination to maturity), which increased seeding emergence but was detrimental to pod setting and pod development (soil temperature exceeded 40 °C). Thus, the benefit of polythene was only observed when it was retained up to podding stage, but not up to harvest. The combined application of wheat straw and black polythene out-yielded sole application of wheat straw mulch but the former was 45% less profitable than the later one because of the cost of polythene. Wheat straw mulch was finally demonstrated to the farmer's field. It was found that sacrificing 5 t wheat straw as cattle feed, farmers on return get additional 0.47 t ha−1 legume fodder due to mulching which is nutritionally superior quality fodder in terms of crude protein, phosphorus content, crude fiber, ash and silica content compared to wheat straw as cattle feed. Thus, 16% additional production of highly nutritive groundnut haulm due to mulching has a significant implication on (i) nutritional fodder security, especially during the dry season when green fodder is costly and its availability is limited, and (ii) additional income of Rs. 3935 ha−1 from mulch. These two considerations, apart from solving temperature related problems convinced 32 farmers of Vadhvi and Zanjarda village of Junagadh district, Gujarat for adoption of wheat straw technology for summer groundnut in about 50 ha areas.