KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/4202
Title: | Effects of rain shelter or simulated rain during grain filling and maturation on subsequent wheat grain quality in the UK |
Authors: | GAJENDER YADAV AND R. H. ELLIS |
Published/ Complete Date: | 2017 |
Keywords: | Rainfall, wheat, seed filling, grain quality |
Publisher: | Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) |
Citation: | Yadav, Gajender and Ellis R. H. (2017) Effects of rain shelter or simulated rain during grain filling and maturation drying on subsequent wheat grain quality in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge), 155: 300–316 |
Abstract/Description: | The effects of simulated additional rain (ear wetting, 25 mm) or of rain shelter imposed at different periods after anthesis on grain quality at maturity and the dynamics of grain filling and desiccation were investigated in UK field-grown crops of wheat (Triticum aestivum L., cvar Tybalt) in 2011 and in 2012 when June–August rainfall was 255·0 and 214·6 mm, respectively, and above the decadal mean (157·4 mm). Grain filling and desiccation were quantified well by broken-stick regressions and Gompertz curves, respectively. Rain shelter for 56 (2011) or 70 days (2012) after anthesis, and to a lesser extent during late maturation only, resulted in more rapid desiccation and hence progress to harvest maturity whereas ear wetting had negligible effects, even when applied four times. Grain-filling duration was also affected as above in 2011, but with no significant effect in 2012. In both years, there were strong positive associations between final grain dry weight and duration of filling. The treatments affected all grain quality traits in 2011: nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S) concentrations, N : S ratio, sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) sedimentation volume, Hagberg Falling Number (HFN), and the incidence of blackpoint. Only N concentration and blackpoint were affected significantly by treatments in 2012. Rain shelter throughout grain filling reduced N concentration, whereas rain shelter reduced the incidence of blackpoint and ear wetting increased it. In 2011, rain shelter throughout reduced S concentration, increased N : S ratio and reduced SDS. Treatment effects on HFN were not consistent within or between years. Nevertheless, a comparison between the extreme treatment means in 2012 indicated damage from late rain combined with ear wetting resulted in a reduction of c. 0·7 s in HFN/mm August rainfall, while that between samples taken immediately after ear wetting at harvest maturity or 7 days later suggested recovery from damage to HFN upon re-drying in planta. Hence, the incidence of blackpoint was the only grain quality trait affected consistently by the diverse treatments. The remaining aspects of grain quality were comparatively resilient to rain incident upon developing and maturing ears of cvar Tybalt. No consistent temporal patterns of sensitivity to shelter or ear wetting were detected for any aspect of grain quality. |
ISSN: | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616000411 |
Type(s) of content: | Research Paper |
Sponsors: | Commonwealth Scholarship Commission |
Language: | English |
Name of Journal: | Journal of Agricultural Sciences |
Volume No.: | 155 |
Page Number: | 300–316 |
Name of the Division/Regional Station: | Division of Soil and Crop Management |
Source, DOI or any other URL: | 10.1017/S0021859616000411 |
URI: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/4202 |
Appears in Collections: | NRM-CSSRI-Publication |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yadav and Ellis 2017 Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge.pdf | 1.68 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.