KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/72398
Title: | Performance of Bayesian and BLUP alphabets for genomic prediction: analysis, comparison and results |
Other Titles: | Not Available |
Authors: | Prabina Kumar Meher Sachin Rustgi Anuj Kumar |
ICAR Data Use Licennce: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/PDF/ICAR_Data_Use_Licence.pdf |
Author's Affiliated institute: | ICAR::Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University Pee Dee Research and Education Center, Darlington, SC, USA Centre for Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi-12, India |
Published/ Complete Date: | 2022-05-04 |
Project Code: | Not Available |
Keywords: | Bayesian methods BLUP Estimated breeding value |
Publisher: | Nature Publishing Group |
Citation: | Meher, P.K., Rustgi, S. & Kumar, A. (2022) Performance of Bayesian and BLUP alphabets for genomic prediction: analysis, comparison and results. Heredity (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-022-00539-9 |
Series/Report no.: | Not Available; |
Abstract/Description: | We evaluated the performances of three BLUP and five Bayesian methods for genomic prediction by using nine actual and 54 simulated datasets. The genomic prediction accuracy was measured using Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) and the observed phenotypic data using a fivefold cross-validation approach with 100 replications. The Bayesian alphabets performed better for the traits governed by a few genes/QTLs with relatively larger effects. On the contrary, the BLUP alphabets (GBLUP and CBLUP) exhibited higher genomic prediction accuracy for the traits controlled by several small-effect QTLs. Additionally, Bayesian methods performed better for the highly heritable traits and, for other traits, performed at par with the BLUP methods. Further, genomic BLUP (GBLUP) was identified as the least biased method for the GEBV estimation. Among the … |
Description: | Not Available |
ISSN: | Not Available |
Type(s) of content: | Research Paper |
Sponsors: | Not Available |
Language: | English |
Name of Journal: | Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants |
Volume No.: | Not Available |
Page Number: | 1-12 |
Name of the Division/Regional Station: | Not Available |
Source, DOI or any other URL: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-022-00539-9 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35508540/ |
URI: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/72398 |
Appears in Collections: | AEdu-IASRI-Publication |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.