KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/57659
Title: | Sustainable Livelihood Assessment of Taro and Paddy Growers in Nayagarh District of Odisha |
Other Titles: | Not Available |
Authors: | D. Jaganathan*, Sheela Immanuel, P. Prakash and P.S. Sivakumar |
ICAR Data Use Licennce: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/PDF/ICAR_Data_Use_Licence.pdf |
Author's Affiliated institute: | ICAR::Central Tuber Crops Research Institute |
Published/ Complete Date: | 2020-01-01 |
Project Code: | Not Available |
Keywords: | Livelihood taro |
Publisher: | Not Available |
Citation: | Not Available |
Series/Report no.: | Not Available; |
Abstract/Description: | Livelihood assessment was conducted among 50 taro and 50 paddy growing farmers in Nayagarh district of Odisha, India. Data were collected using PRA tools, interview schedule and focus group discussions. Livelihood sustainable index was estimated using the DFID methodology. The analysis revealed that the average a ge of taro and paddy growers was almost similar (55 years). The average yield of taro (43.34 quintal/acre) was higher than the yield of paddy (20.94 quintal/acre). There was significant difference in the yield, cost of cult ivation and net profit between taro and paddy. On an average, the taro growers realized 128% higher net returns than the paddy growers. The rural sustainable livelihood index was marginally more for paddy (60) than taro growers (59). The mean values of different capitals of taro and paddy growers were in the decreasing order with respect to physical, natural, social, human and financial capitals. Lack of market facilities was ranked first with a mea n score of 2.51 out of maximum score of 3. The other constraints reported by the taro farmers were, price fluctuatio n (2.21), lack of irrigation facilities (2.04), wild animals attack (1.98) and non availability of skilled lab our (1.74). Lack of irrigation facilities (2.35), weather aberrations (2.15), incidence of pests and diseases (2.0) and non availability of skilled labour (1.98) were perceived as major constraints in paddy cultivation. |
Description: | Not Available |
ISSN: | Not Available |
Type(s) of content: | Journal |
Sponsors: | Not Available |
Language: | English |
Name of Journal: | Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development |
NAAS Rating: | 5.67 |
Volume No.: | 15(3) |
Page Number: | 686-693 |
Name of the Division/Regional Station: | Not Available |
Source, DOI or any other URL: | Not Available |
URI: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/57659 |
Appears in Collections: | HS-CTCRI-Publication |
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.