KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/63165
Title: | Economic performance of artificial reefs deployed along Tamil Nadu coast, South India |
Other Titles: | Not Available |
Authors: | Kasim,H M Rao,G Syda Rajagopalan,M Vivekanandan,E Mohanraj,G Kandasamy,D Muthiah,P Jagadis,I Gopakumar,G Mohan,S |
ICAR Data Use Licennce: | Not Available |
Author's Affiliated institute: | Not Available |
Published/ Complete Date: | 2013 |
Project Code: | Not Available |
Keywords: | Artificial reef (AR) site, Catch per unit effort (CPUE), Economic benefit Non-artificial reef (NAR) site Payback period Value per unit effort (VPUE) |
Publisher: | Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute |
Citation: | Not Available |
Series/Report no.: | Not Available |
Abstract/Description: | The economics of fishery from artificial reef (AR) and non-artificial reef (NAR) sites by gillnet and hooks & line was studied during 2007-08 from 11 fishing villages in 6 coastal districts of Tamil Nadu. The Tamil Nadu State Fisheries Department fabricated and deployed the reefs under the technical guidance of the Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI). Based on species composition in the catch, the annual gross income was estimated by multiplying each species/group catch with the average landing centre price of the respective species/group. After deducting recurring expenditures on fishing operation, maintenance, interest on capital/investment on reef, crew wages, depreciation on craft, gear and reefs, from the gross income, the average net income of gillnet and hooks & line per unit operation from AR site were `1252 and `4650, respectively; and from NAR site was `449 and `1919, respectively. On an average, the AR site offered economic benefit which was higher by `1705.9 per unit compared to NAR site. Hooks & line units performed better than the gillnet units in both the sites. The payback period towards repayment of AR establishment cost was only 0.21 year. In view of better economic viability and short payback period, deployment of artificial reef is recommended in the near shore waters with proper planning. |
Description: | Not Available |
ISSN: | Not Available |
Type(s) of content: | Article |
Sponsors: | Not Available |
Language: | English |
Name of Journal: | Indian Journal of Fisheries |
Volume No.: | 60 |
Page Number: | 44409 |
Name of the Division/Regional Station: | Not Available |
Source, DOI or any other URL: | http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/9370/1/152.pdf |
URI: | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/63165 |
Appears in Collections: | FS-CMFRI-Publication |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.