KRISHI
ICAR RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(An Institutional Publication and Data Inventory Repository)
"Not Available": Please do not remove the default option "Not Available" for the fields where metadata information is not available
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
"1001-01-01": Date not available or not applicable for filling metadata infromation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/77415
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Not Available | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-16T04:08:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-16T04:08:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-02-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Not Available | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | Not Available | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/77415 | - |
dc.description | Not Available | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The contribution of four variables, namely Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), Sea Surface Temperature (SST), diffuse attenuation coefficient (Kd_490 or Kd), and Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR), in predicting the catches of major pelagic fish species (Indian mackerel, horse mackerel, Bombay duck, oil sardine, and other sardines) was evaluated using Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA). The outcome of the analysis was compared with those obtained by using the following models and methods: the Generalized Linear Model (GLM), the Generalized Additive Model (GAM), connection weight methods, and the explanatory methods of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). Both the sets of results were in agreement. Neither the GAM nor the ANNs method showed any clear advantage over each other, although the GAM performed better than the GLM. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Not Available | en_US |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | ResearchGate | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Not Available; | - |
dc.subject | Artificial neural networks, Canonical correlation analysis, Fish resources, Generalized additive model, Generalised linear model, Sensitivity analysis | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison between different modeling techniques for assessing the role of environmental variables in predicting the catches of major pelagic fishes off India’s north-west coast. | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Not Available | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
dc.publication.projectcode | Not Available | en_US |
dc.publication.journalname | Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences | en_US |
dc.publication.volumeno | 51(2) | en_US |
dc.publication.pagenumber | 194-203 | en_US |
dc.publication.divisionUnit | Not Available | en_US |
dc.publication.sourceUrl | Not Available | en_US |
dc.publication.authorAffiliation | Yadav VK*, Jahageerdar S, Adinarayana J | en_US |
dc.ICARdataUseLicence | http://krishi.icar.gov.in/PDF/ICAR_Data_Use_Licence.pdf | en_US |
dc.publication.journaltype | Indian Journal | en_US |
dc.publication.naasrating | 6.50 | en_US |
dc.publication.impactfactor | 0.499 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | FS-CIFE-Publication |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in KRISHI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.