Interstate river conflicts: lessons from India and the US
DSpace at IIT Bombay
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
Interstate river conflicts: lessons from India and the US
|
|
Creator |
GUNDIMEDA, H
HOWE, CW |
|
Subject |
colorado-river
drought conflict resolution interstate compacts equitable apportionment benefit sharing basin-wide water markets india us |
|
Description |
In both India and the US, the majority of rivers are interstate and the states retain substantial legal power over water resources. In the US, negotiation of river compacts has not eliminated controversy, due to their inflexibility over time. In India, court-appointed tribunals, employed for major interstate river conflicts, have frequently relied on a vague principle of just and equitable apportionment in resolving interstate disputes. The experiences of the two countries show that conflict resolution must involve positive rewards for all the parties involved. This involves imaginative application of the principle of benefit sharing and the expansion of water markets to cover the entire river basin.
|
|
Publisher |
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
|
|
Date |
2011-08-27T11:01:25Z
2011-12-26T12:57:53Z 2011-12-27T05:45:54Z 2011-08-27T11:01:25Z 2011-12-26T12:57:53Z 2011-12-27T05:45:54Z 2008 |
|
Type |
Article
|
|
Identifier |
WATER INTERNATIONAL, 33(4), 395-405
0250-8060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02508060802542081 http://dspace.library.iitb.ac.in/xmlui/handle/10054/11642 http://hdl.handle.net/10054/11642 |
|
Language |
en
|
|