Record Details

Interstate river conflicts: lessons from India and the US

DSpace at IIT Bombay

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Interstate river conflicts: lessons from India and the US
 
Creator GUNDIMEDA, H
HOWE, CW
 
Subject colorado-river
drought
conflict resolution
interstate compacts
equitable apportionment
benefit sharing
basin-wide water markets
india
us
 
Description In both India and the US, the majority of rivers are interstate and the states retain substantial legal power over water resources. In the US, negotiation of river compacts has not eliminated controversy, due to their inflexibility over time. In India, court-appointed tribunals, employed for major interstate river conflicts, have frequently relied on a vague principle of just and equitable apportionment in resolving interstate disputes. The experiences of the two countries show that conflict resolution must involve positive rewards for all the parties involved. This involves imaginative application of the principle of benefit sharing and the expansion of water markets to cover the entire river basin.
 
Publisher ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
 
Date 2011-08-27T11:01:25Z
2011-12-26T12:57:53Z
2011-12-27T05:45:54Z
2011-08-27T11:01:25Z
2011-12-26T12:57:53Z
2011-12-27T05:45:54Z
2008
 
Type Article
 
Identifier WATER INTERNATIONAL, 33(4), 395-405
0250-8060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02508060802542081
http://dspace.library.iitb.ac.in/xmlui/handle/10054/11642
http://hdl.handle.net/10054/11642
 
Language en