Evaluation of substrate removal kinetics for UASB reactors treating chlorinated ethanes
DSpace at IIT Bombay
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
Evaluation of substrate removal kinetics for UASB reactors treating chlorinated ethanes
|
|
Creator |
BASU, D
ASOLEKAR, SR |
|
Subject |
Chlorinated ethanes
Kinetic constants UASB reactor HRT Substrate removal METHANOGENIC GRANULAR SLUDGE REDUCTIVE DECHLORINATION WASTE-WATER DEGRADATION KINETICS TETRACHLOROETHYLENE TRANSFORMATIONS BIODEGRADATION 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE |
|
Description |
Lack of focus on the treatment of wastewaters bearing potentially hazardous pollutants like 1,1,2 trichloroethane and 1,1,2,2 tetrachloroethane in anaerobic reactors has provided an impetus to undertake this study. The objective of this exercise was to quantify the behavior of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors and predict their performance based on the overall organic substrate removal. The reactors (wastewater-bearing TCA (R2), and wastewater-bearing TeCA (R3)) were operated at different hydraulic retention times (HRTs), i.e., 36, 30, 24, 18, and 12 h corresponding to food-to-mass ratios varying in the range of 0.2-0.7 mg chemical oxygen demand (COD) mg(-1) volatile suspended solids day(-1). The process kinetics of substrate utilization was evaluated on the basis of experimental results, by applying three mathematical models namely first order, Grau second order, and Michaelis-Menten type kinetics. The results showed that the lowering of HRT below 24 h resulted in reduced COD removal efficiencies and higher effluent pollutant concentrations in the reactors. The Grau second-order model was successfully applied to obtain the substrate utilization kinetics with high value of R (2) (> 0.95). The Grau second-order substrate removal constant (K (2)) was calculated as 1.12 and 7.53 day(-1) for reactors R2 and R3, respectively. This study demonstrated the suitability of Grau second-order kinetic model over other models, for predicting the performance of reactors R2 and R3, in treating wastewaters containing chlorinated ethanes under different organic and hydraulic loading conditions.
|
|
Publisher |
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
|
|
Date |
2014-10-17T05:02:51Z
2014-10-17T05:02:51Z 2012 |
|
Type |
Article
|
|
Identifier |
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 19(6)2419-2427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0754-y http://dspace.library.iitb.ac.in/jspui/handle/100/16017 |
|
Language |
en
|
|