Record Details

Starch and cell wall degrading enzymes from fungal organisms grown on cereal and millet brans

IR@CSIR-CFTRI

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Relation http://ir.cftri.com/216/
EJRT-35-2005
 
Title Starch and cell wall degrading enzymes from fungal organisms grown on cereal and millet brans
 
Creator Kavitha, S.
Shyamala, Hegde
Muralikrishna, G.
Varadaraj, M. C.
 
Subject 21 Cereals
16 Enzyme Chemistry
 
Description

In the global market, there has been an increasing demand for “natural products”. In this direction,
the present study has attempted to evaluate fungal organisms
as a source of starch and cell wall degrading enzymes which have a role to play in obtaining ferulic acid from brans of cereal and millet and are subsequently biotransformed to vanillin. Three fungal organisms,namely Aspergillus niger CFR 1105, A. oryzae CFR 232 and Rhizopus arrhizus NCIM 997, were grown on brans of wheat, rice and ragi (Eleusine coracana) for 24-, 48-,72- and 96-h time intervals, and the resultant moldy brans were evaluated for starch and cell wall degrading enzymes. The activity of amylase, the most preponderant enzyme in all the moldy brans, was several times higher than the pullulanse activity. Xylanase activity was 2–3 times higher than that of 1,3/1,4-b-D-glucanase in all the moldy brans. A. niger CFR 1105 and A. oryzae CFR 232 were found to be better than R. arrhizus
NCIM 997 with respect to the induction of starch and cell
wall degrading enzymes and can be utilized for the degradation of cell wall polymers of wheat, rice and ragi
brans. Wheat bran was found to be a better substrate than
rice and ragi brans for the induction of those enzymes.


 
Date 2005-12
 
Type Article
PeerReviewed
 
Format application/pdf
 
Language en
 
Rights
 
Identifier http://ir.cftri.com/216/1/Eur_Food_Res_Technol_%282005%29_220_560-564.pdf
Kavitha, S. and Shyamala, Hegde and Muralikrishna, G. and Varadaraj, M. C. (2005) Starch and cell wall degrading enzymes from fungal organisms grown on cereal and millet brans. European Food Research and Technology, 220. pp. 560-564.