Record Details

Insights Into The Mechanism Of Actions Of Luteinizing Hormone And Prostaglandin F2α In The Regulation Of Corpus Luteum Function Of Monoovulatory Species

Electronic Theses of Indian Institute of Science

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Insights Into The Mechanism Of Actions Of Luteinizing Hormone And Prostaglandin F2α In The Regulation Of Corpus Luteum Function Of Monoovulatory Species
 
Creator Shah, Kunal B
 
Subject Corpus Luteum (CL)
Luteolysis
Monkey - Luteolysis
Corpus Luteum - Signaling
Buffalo Cows - Luteolysis
Monoovulation
Luteinizing Hormones
Reproductive System - Hormones
Prostaglandins
Gonadotropin Receptor-Mediated Signaling
Chorionic Gonadotropin (CG)
PGF2α
Physiology
 
Description Corpus luteum (CL), a transient endocrine structure formed from the ruptured ovarian follicle after ovulation, secretes progesterone (P4) that is essential for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in mammals. The biosynthesis and secretion of P4 from CL depends, in general, on trophic hormones of the anterior pituitary gland and on hormones or factors originating from ovary, uterus, embryo and placenta. The structure and function of CL tissue is regulated by intricate interplay between two types of factors, namely, the luteotrophic factors, which stimulate CL growth and function, i.e., P4 secretion, and the luteolytic factors, which inhibit CL function and lead to luteal regression. In monoovulatory species such as higher primates and bovines, a striking diversity in the regulation of CL function exists not only between species, but also within the species during different stages of the luteal phase. In higher primates, unlike other species, one of the important characteristics of CL regulation is that, during non-fertile cycle, circulating LH appears to be the sole trophic factor responsible for maintenance of its function, and during fertile cycle, chorionic gonadotropin (CG), an LH analogue, originating from placenta maintains CL function. In higher primates, the role/involvement of luteolytic factors during luteolysis remains elusive. On the other hand, in the bovine species, the role/involvement of luteolytic factor, prostaglandin (PG) F2α during luteolysis is well established. It should be pointed out that in both the species, the mechanism of luteolysis is still poorly understood and the work presented in this thesis attempts to address these lacunae. Further, in bovines, studies have been carried out to examine potential trophic factor(s) responsible for the maintenance of CL function.
Chapter I provides an extensive review of literature on CL structure and function with emphasis on factors that influence its growth, development, function and demise in primates and bovines. In Chapter II, employing bonnet monkey (Macaca radiata) as the representative animal model for higher primates, various studies have been conducted to examine the role of molecular modulators involved in regulation of CL function, particularly during spontaneous luteolysis. Although, it is well established that LH is essential for the maintenance of CL function in higher primates, the mechanism(s) responsible for the decline in serum P4 levels at the end of non-fertile cycles, without a concomitant change in circulating LH milieu, remains to be addressed. Several experiments have been conducted to examine the component(s) of luteotrophic (LH/CG) signaling that is/are modulated during luteolysis in the bonnet monkey CL. To understand the relative lack of responsiveness of CL to the circulating LH during the late luteal phase, LH/CG receptor (R) dynamics (expression of LH/CGR and its various transcript variants) was examined throughout the luteal phase and during different functional states of the monkey CL. The results indicated presence of LH/CGR mRNA, its transcript variants and functional LH/CGR protein in the monkey CL on day 1 of menses. Moreover, the functionality of receptors was tested by confirming the biological response of the CL to bolus administration of exogenous LH preparations, which eventually suggested factor(s) downstream of LH/CGR activation to account for the decline in CL function observed during non-fertile cycle.
Studies have been conducted to identify molecular modulators that would selectively exploit intraluteal processes to regulate trophic signaling pathways that are critical to the control of luteal function. Immunoblot and qPCR analyses were carried out to examine presence and activation of Src family of kinases (SFKs) and cAMP-phosphodiesterases (PDEs) during various functional states of CL. The results revealed an increased activation of Src (phosphorylated at Tyr 416) during spontaneous and PGF2α/CET-induced luteolysis that may participate in the regulation of cAMP levels in part by increasing the cAMP-PDE activity observed during spontaneous luteolysis. This observation raised the question on the possible mechanism by which CG, an analog of pituitary LH, rescues CL function during early pregnancy. Thus, subsequent experiments involving LH/hCG administration in CET-treated animals as well as simulated early pregnancy animal model were conducted and the results revealed that, a bolus of LH/hCG decreased Src activation and cAMP-PDE activity accompanying a momentous increase in cAMP levels in both these models that further led to a concomitant increase in P4 secretion.
Although the mechanisms of action of LH/CG involve modulation of a number of signaling pathways in the CL, by far, the results from various experiments suggested that it leads to activation of Src kinase and cAMP-PDE, thus causing inhibition of various elements of the primary signaling cascade- AC/cAMP/PKA/CREB during spontaneous luteolysis. One of the consequences of activation of Src kinase and cAMP-PDE was the regulation of expression of genes associated with steroidogenesis and it was observed that expression of SR-B1, a membrane receptor associated with trafficking of HDL-CE into the luteal cells, was lower in the regressed CL. The results taken together suggest that the decrease in responsiveness of CL to LH milieu during non-fertile cycles is not associated with changes in LH/CGR dynamics, but, is instead coupled to the activation of Src kinase and cAMP-PDE, inhibition of molecules downstream of LH signaling, and a decrease in the SR-B1 expression that regulates cholesterol economy of the luteal cell, and in turn, P4 secretion. The control of primate CL function appears to be dominated by the luteotrophic factors (LH/CG) over the luteolytic factors, since the process of luteal regression was overcome by administration of LH/CG. Further, in the primate CL, the molecular modulators of LH/CG signaling (Src kinase and PDE) are maintained in the repressed state by the luteotrophic factor LH/CG for maximum steroidogenic function. In contrast, in non-primate species, without invoking a role for the luteotrophic factor, essentially the synthesis and secretion of luteolytic factor, PGF2α, from the uterus is kept in check during pregnancy by the trophoblast derived IFN- and thus allowing CL to continue to function that is essential for maintenance of pregnancy.
In the bovine species, the mechanism of PGF2α-induced luteolysis that involves a change in expression of genes associated with various processes of cellular function is poorly understood. Experiments were conducted utilizing buffalo cows (Bubalus bubalis) as a model system, to determine temporal changes in the global gene expression profile of the CL in response to PGF2α treatment. For this purpose, CL tissues were collected on day 11 of estrous cycle without treatment (designated as 0 h) and at 3, 6 and 18 h post PGF2α treatment for various analyses. Global changes in gene expression pattern in the CL were investigated employing Affymetrix GeneChip bovine genome array and the results are presented in Chapter III. The hybridization intensity values obtained by microarray analysis were subjected to R/Bioconductor tool. Following the application of highly stringent statistical filters to eliminate false positives, a set of differentially expressed genes were identified. The differentially expressed genes were further classified based on a fold change cut-off filter of ≥2, and the analysis revealed 127 genes to be differentially expressed within 3 h of PGF2α administration, of these 64 and 63 genes were up-regulated and down-regulated, respectively. Analysis of microarray data at 6 h post PGF2α administration revealed 774 genes to be differentially expressed, of which 544 genes were up-regulated, while 230 genes were down-regulated. The microarray analysis performed on CL tissues collected at 18 h post PGF2α administration showed that out of the total 939 differentially expressed genes, 571 genes were up-regulated, while 368 genes were down-regulated.
Analysis of the ontology report for the biological processes category showed that initially in response to PGF2α administration, genes regulating steroidogenesis, cell survival and transcription were differentially regulated in the CL, but at later time points, differential expression of genes involved in apoptosis, PGF2α metabolism, tissue remodeling and angiogenesis was observed. Further, involvement of molecules downstream of LH/IGF-1 activation was investigated and the results obtained indicated that PGF2α interfered with the LH/IGF-1 signaling since the expression of LH/CGR, GHR and pAkt were down-regulated following PGF2αadministration. Furthermore, the functional luteolysis observed post PGF2αadministration appeared to be due to an interruption in cholesterol trafficking to inner mitochondrial membrane, since StAR expression was inhibited. The results obtained also demonstrated that the expression of AGTR1, VEGFR2 and R3 were down-regulated following PGF 2α administration. Further, the data obtained also suggested modulation of expression of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors upon PGF2α-treatment indicative of an involvement of other autocrine or paracrine factor(s) in the regression of bovine CL. This was an interesting finding as it suggests a novel and potential functional relationship between angiogenesis and the luteolytic response of CL to PGF2α administration.
In bovines, despite extensive research being carried out to examine factors involved in the regulation of development and function of the CL, the trophic factor(s) required for maintenance of CL function, especially, P4 biosynthesis and secretion are not well characterized. It was hypothesized that the function of the CL during its finite lifespan must be responsive to LH as well as to various growth factors. Thus, experiments were conducted to examine the effects of increased LH and GH/IGF-I on the maintenance of CL function during mid luteal phase and post PGF2α administration and the results of these studies are presented in Chapter IV. To elucidate the role of LH as a trophic factor in the regulation of CL function, effects of increased endogenous LH through GnRH administration and exogenous hCG injections were examined. The results indicated an absence of noticeable effect of various hCG/GnRH treatments on circulating P4 levels. On the other hand, administration of GH resulted in increased serum IGF-1 and P4 levels. It was further observed that the administration of a combination of hCG and GH increased serum P4 levels better than treatment with GH alone.
Further experiments were carried out to examine the complex reciprocal relationship between LH/GH and PGF2α on expression of genes involved in the regulation of luteal structure and function. In buffalo cows, administration of exogenous hCG and/or GH following inhibition of CL function by PGF2α administration did not prevent the PGF2α-induced decline in serum P4 levels, but PGF2-mediated decrease in expression of LH/CGR and GHR genes was prevented upon GH administration. However, the decrease in StAR expression was not restored by hCG and GH treatments, thereby indicating that PGF2 action was not prevented by hCG and/or GH treatments.
Taken together, the results of studies carried out in buffalo cows employing various experimental model systems suggest essential role for LH and GH/IGF-1, however, these factors were unable to reverse PGF2α-induced luteolysis. Further, our crucial findings of the effects of increased endogenous LH and IGF-1, in addition to their relationship with luteolytic agents such as PGF2α will open new avenues for studying the mechanisms involved in the regulation of structural and functional properties of the buffalo CL. It is well known that a large number of buffalo cows experience loss of pregnancy and infertility due to inadequate luteal function and/or failure of timely insemination. Results from our studies suggest that the incorporation of PGF2α and hCG or GH/IGF-1 protocols in buffalo cows to be beneficial for improving their breeding efficiency as these protocols are likely to increase luteal function with defined luteolysis.
To summarize, the results of studies described in the present thesis provide new insights into the physiological and molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of CL function during luteolysis in the monoovulatory species. The results suggest that the maintenance of CL function appears to be dependent on both luteotrophic and luteolytic factors, but with a varied degree of dominance between the two species examined. Further, the results indicate that while the luteotrophic factors (LH/CG) dominate the CL regulation in primates, the regulation of CL function in bovines is dominated by the actions of luteolytic factor (PGF2α). In monoovulatory species, the luteotrophic and luteolytic factors following binding to their specific plasma membrane receptors on the luteal cells, would counteract each other and modulate activation of various downstream signaling molecules subsequently leading to regulation of gene expression and P4 secretion (Fig.5.1). LH: luteinizing hormone; CG: chorionic gonadotropin; LH/CGR: LH/CG receptor; Gαs: stimulatory α-subunit of trimeric G-protein; AC: adenylate cyclase; cAMP: cyclic adenosine monophosphate; PKA: protein kinase A; p: phosphorylation: CREB: cAMP response element binding protein; SR-B1: scavenger receptor class B, type I; SF-1: steroidogenic factor 1; LRH-1: liver receptor homologue 1; P4; progesterone; Src; sarcoma; PDE4D: cAMP phosphodiesterase 4D; StAR, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein; PGF2α: prostaglandin F2α; PTGFR: PGF2α receptor; PLC: phospholipase C; CYP19A1: cytochrome P450 aromatase; PTGR1: Prostaglandin reductase 1; AREG: Amphiregulin; RTK: receptor tyrosine kinase; Akt: protein kinase B; FKHR: forkhead transcription factor; DAPL1: death associated protein like 1; ARG2: Arginase, type II

Growth factor LH/CGR
RR AC Gαs ? Gα TT P? Gα K PKP src
cAMP ? P Akt
PDE4D
P
PFKHR FKHR
CREB P LRH-1CREB P
SF-1
Genes associated with Genes associated with apoptosis ? CYP19A1, apoptosis SR-B1 PTGR1 DAPL1 SF-1, LRH-1 AREG ARG 2
P4 biosynthesis Apoptosis? P4 biosynthesis Apoptosis
MONKEY BUFFALO COW

Shown here is the diagram depicting intracellular signaling pathways regulated by luteotrophic factor (LH) and luteolytic factor (PGF2α) and their cross talk to counteract changes in the expressions of genes associated with the biosynthesis and secretion of P4 and apoptosis in the CL. In primates, LH/CG activates a multitude of intracellular signaling cascades, primarily Gαs/AC/cAMP/PKA/CREB leading to changes in gene expression. LH during early and mid luteal phase and CG during pregnancy maintain the activation of Src and PDE in an inhibitory state. However, during the late luteal phase of non-fertile cycle, results in present study suggests that activated Src levels and PDE activity increase, with accompanying decrease in cAMP and pCREB levels leading to concomitant decrease in SR-B1 expression, and in turn, P4 secretion. Surprisingly, regulation of apoptotic gene expression and CL regression are still unclear. In bovines, PGF2α of uterine origin mediates changes in luteal gene expression and results in decreased P4 secretion, principally by reduction in StAR level. The present study suggests that during luteolysis PGF2α affects the genes regulated by LH, by interfering with LH (and perhaps IGF-1) signaling leading to alteration in the expression of genes crucial for CL structure and function.
(Pl refer the abstract file for figures)
 
Contributor Medhamurthy, R
 
Date 2016-11-11T07:42:17Z
2016-11-11T07:42:17Z
2016-11-11
2012-07
 
Type Thesis
 
Identifier http://etd.iisc.ernet.in/handle/2005/2581
http://etd.ncsi.iisc.ernet.in/abstracts/3350/G25342-Abs.pdf
 
Language en_US
 
Relation G25342