Record Details

Comparison of tropical cyclogenesis indices on seasonal to interannual timescales

DRS at CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Comparison of tropical cyclogenesis indices on seasonal to interannual timescales
 
Creator Menkes, C.E.
Lengaigne, M.
Marchesiello, P.
Jourdain, N.C.
Vincent, E.M.
Lefevre, J.
Chauvin, F.
Royer, J.-F.
 
Subject cyclogenesis
temporal variations
el nino phenomena
southern oscillation
 
Description The performances of four cyclogenesis indices against observed tropical cyclone genesis on a global scale over the period 1979–2001 are evaluated. These indices are: the Genesis Potential Index; the Yearly Genesis Parameter; the Modified Yearly Convective Genesis Potential Index; and the Tippett et al. Index (J Clim, 2011), hereafter referred to as TCS. Choosing ERA40, NCEP2, NCEP or JRA25 reanalysis to calculate these indices can yield regional differences but overall does not change the main conclusions arising from this study. By contrast, differences between indices are large and vary depending on the regions and on the timescales considered. All indices except the TCS show an equatorward bias in mean cyclogenesis, especially in the northern hemisphere where this bias can reach 5 degrees. Mean simulated genesis numbers for all indices exhibit large regional discrepancies, which can commonly reach up to + or -50%. For the seasonal timescales on which the indices are historically fitted, performances also vary widely in terms of amplitude although in general they all reproduce the cyclogenesis seasonality adequately. At the seasonal scale, the TCS seems to be the best fitted index overall. The most striking feature at interannual scales is the inability of all indices to reproduce the observed cyclogenesis amplitude. The indices also lack the ability to reproduce the general interannual phase variability, but they do, however, acceptably reproduce the phase variability linked to El Nin˜o/Southern Oscillation (ENSO)—a major driver of tropical cyclones interannual variations. In terms of cyclogenesis mechanisms that can be inferred from the analysis of the index terms, there are wide variations from one index to another at seasonal and interannual timescales and caution is advised when using these terms from one index only. They do, however, show a very good coherence at ENSO scale thus inspiring confidence in the mechanism interpretations that can be obtained by the use of any index. Finally, part of the gap between the observed and simulated cyclogenesis amplitudes may be attributable to stochastic processes, which cannot be inferred from environmental indices that only represent a potential for cyclogenesis.
 
Date 2012-05-28T09:22:33Z
2012-05-28T09:22:33Z
2012
 
Type Journal Article
 
Identifier Climate Dynamics, vol.38; 2012; 301-321
http://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/4062
 
Language en
 
Rights An edited version of this paper was published by Springer. This paper is for R & D purpose and Copyright [2012] Springer.
 
Publisher Springer-Verlag