Record Details

TropFlux wind stresses over the tropical oceans: Evaluation and comparison with other products

DRS at CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title TropFlux wind stresses over the tropical oceans: Evaluation and comparison with other products
 
Creator PraveenKumar, B.
Vialard, J.
Lengaigne, M.
Murty, V.S.N.
McPhaden, M.J.
Cronin, M.F.
Pinsard, F.
Reddy, K.G.
 
Subject wind stress
air-water exchanges
programmes
evaluation
 
Description We present TropFlux wind stresses and evaluate them against observations along with other widely used daily air-sea momentum flux products (NCEP, NCEP2, ERA-I and QuikSCAT). TropFlux wind stresses are computed from the COARE v3.0 algorithm, using bias and amplitude corrected ERA-I input data and an additional climatological gustiness correction. The wind stress products are evaluated against dependent data from the TAO/TRITON, PIRATA and RAMA arrays and independent data from the OceanSITES mooring networks. Wind stress products are more consistent amongst each other than surface heat fluxes, suggesting that 10 m-winds are better constrained than near-surface thermodynamical parameters (2 m-humidity and temperature) and surface downward radiative fluxes. QuikSCAT overestimates wind stresses away from the equator, while NCEP and NCEP2 underestimate wind stresses, especially in the equatorial Pacific. QuikSCAT wind stress quality is strongly affected by rain under the Inter Tropical Convergence Zones. ERA-I and TropFlux display the best agreement with in situ data, with correlations more than 0.93 and rms-differences less than 0.012 Nm sup(-2). TropFlux wind stresses exhibit a small, but consistent improvement (at all timescales and most locations) over ERA-I, with an overall 17 percent reduction in root mean square error. ERA-I and TropFlux agree best with long-term mean zonal wind stress observations at equatorial latitudes. All products tend to underestimate the zonal wind stress seasonal cycle by approx 20 percent in the western and central equatorial Pacific. TropFlux and ERA-I equatorial zonal wind stresses have clearly the best phase agreement with mooring data at intraseasonal and interannual timescales (correlation of approx 0.9 versus approx 0.8 at best for any other product), with TropFlux correcting the approx 13 percent underestimation of ERA-I variance at both timescales. For example, TropFlux was the best at reproducing westerly wind bursts that played a key role in the 1997–1998 El Nino onset. Hence, we recommend the use of TropFlux for studies of equatorial ocean dynamics.
 
Date 2013-06-17T06:34:17Z
2013-06-17T06:34:17Z
2013
 
Type Journal Article
 
Identifier Climate Dynamics, vol.40; 2013; 2049-2071
no
http://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/4298
 
Language en
 
Relation Clim_Dyn_40_2049.jpg
 
Rights An edited version of this paper was published by Springer. This paper is for R & D purpose and Copyright [2013] Springer.
 
Publisher Springer