Record Details

Estimating discharge from the Godavari river using ENVISAT, Jason-2, and SARAL/AltiKa radar altimeters

DRS at CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Estimating discharge from the Godavari river using ENVISAT, Jason-2, and SARAL/AltiKa radar altimeters
 
Creator Sridevi, T.
Sharma, Rashmi
Mehra, P.
Prasad, K.V.S.R.
 
Subject OCEANOGRAPHIC SUPPORT SERVICES
OCEANOGRAPHY AND LIMNOLOGY
OCEANOGRAPHY AND LIMNOLOGY
 
Description The present work discusses the application of radar altimeters on-board Environmental Satellite (ENVISAT), Jason-2, and Satellite with Argos and AltiKa (SARAL) missions to estimate the Godavari River discharge draining into the Bay of Bengal for the period 2002–2014. Ranges retrieved from the ICE-1 and ICE-3 retracker algorithms were used to estimate the river heights, followed by important range corrections. In situ radar gauge data at Yanam station and river discharge data from Dowlaiswaram dam were used to construct rating curves. This technique was applied to the ENVISAT (2002–2010), SARAL (2013–2014) derived river heights at Yanam and ENVISAT (2002–2010), SARAL (2013–2014), Jason-2 (2008–2014) derived river heights at Bhadrachalam. A hydrodynamic model was used to validate the ENVISAT and SARAL derived heights at Yanam; found that the modelled data are highly correlated with correlation coefficient r = 0.9. We estimate the standard errors of river height for all three altimeters. The values range from 0.15 to 0.40 m, quite within the acceptable accuracy of altimetry for hydrology/river applications. The root mean square error (RMSE) between ENVISAT and in situ discharge is 366 and 253 m3 s-1 at Yanam and Bhadrachalam, respectively. With Jason-2, it is around 620 m3 s-1 at Bhadrachalam. The residual error in individual altimetry data estimates is of the order ±15–25% of the in situ river discharge. The standard errors from ENVISAT at Yanam (Bhadrachalam) for the years 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 are 0.10% (14.70%), 10.30% (2.80%), 8.20% (26.50%), and 25.30% (10.20%), respectively; which are within the range of acceptable errors for discharge measurements (10–25%)
 
Date 2016-03-08T11:23:18Z
2016-03-08T11:23:18Z
2016
 
Type Journal Article
 
Identifier Remote Sensing Letters, vol.7(4); 2016; 348-357
http://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/4914
 
Language en
 
Rights The final and definitive form of the preprint has been published in the "Remote Sensing Letters" © 2016 Taylor & Francis; "Remote Sensing Letters" is available online at http://www.tandfonline.com with open URL of article : http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2150704X.2015.1130876. The term & condition associated with this preprint is at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
 
Publisher Taylor & Francis