EFFECT OF MOISTURE CONSERVATION METHODS AND SPRINKLER IRRIGATION ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)
KrishiKosh
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
EFFECT OF MOISTURE CONSERVATION METHODS AND SPRINKLER IRRIGATION ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)
|
|
Creator |
DENI MANIKYA RAO, P
|
|
Contributor |
CHANDRASEKHAR, K
|
|
Subject |
irrigation, irrigation methods, sprinklers, developmental stages, land resources, yields, chickpeas, planting, sowing, biological development
SPRINKLER IRRIGATION, CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) |
|
Description |
A field experiment was conducted on sandy clay soils of the Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla, entitled “Effect of moisture conservation methods and sprinkler irrigation on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)” during rabi, 2008-09. The treatments consisted of three moisture conservation methods (L1- flat sowing, L2- broadbed-and-furrow (BBF) and L3- ridge-and-furrow (RF) systems) assigned to horizontal strips and four sprinkler irrigation systems (I0 - no irrigation, I1 - one sprinkler irrigation at branching, I2 - one Sprinkler irrigation at pod initiation and I3-two sprinkler irrigations each at branching and at pod initiation stages) as vertical strips arranged in a strip plot design and were replicated thrice The tallest plants and more number of branches per plant at 30 DAS were recorded with crop grown on broadbed-and-furrows system, over ridge- and-furrow and flat systems. Flat bed land configuration proved significantly inferior over other two land configurations in increasing growth parameters of chickpea. The maximum drymatter accumulated under broadbed-and-furrow system with two sprinkler irrigations was on a par with ridge-and-furrow system with one sprinkler irrigation. Irrigation at branching and pod initiation stages (I3) resulted in higher plant height, drymatter and number of days to 50% flowering over one-time irrigation either at branching or pod initiation stages. However, the difference in drymatter production between one-time irrigation at branching and at pod initiation stages was not significant. Chickpea sown on broadbed-and-furrow system recorded significantly higher number of pods per plant, test weight, seed yield and haulm yield over that of other two land configurations. However, the number of seeds per pod recorded with broadbed-and-furrow system was on a par with ridge-and-furrow system. Application of two sprinkler irrigations each at branching and pod development stages resulted in significantly higher number of pods per plant, seeds per pod and ultimately yield over one-time irrigation at branching (I1) or at pod development (I2) and no irrigation (I0). Irrigation at branching (I1) found significantly superior to irrigation at pod development (I2) in increasing number of pods per plant, test weight and finally the seed and haulm yields. However, the number of seeds per pod of chickpea recorded with one-time irrigation either at branching or at pod initiation stages was not significant. The highest consumptive use of water recorded with broadbed-and- furrow system was on a par with that of ridge-and-furrow system. However, the water use efficiency recorded with BBF was significantly higher than that of the other two moisture conservation practices. Application of two irrigations resulted in significantly more consumptive use and moisture use rate than with one irrigation. A higher return per rupee invested was realized from BBF system with two irrigations (L2I3). Overall, the results showed that sowing on broadbed-and-furrow system found suitable for higher productivity of chickpea over ridge-and-furrow and flat bed systems. Two sprinkler irrigations each at branching and at pod initiation stages were found optimum as evidenced by higher drymatter production and seed yield. |
|
Date |
2016-06-03T09:16:51Z
2016-06-03T09:16:51Z 2011 |
|
Type |
Thesis
|
|
Identifier |
http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/66673
|
|
Language |
en
|
|
Relation |
D9012;
|
|
Format |
application/pdf
|
|
Publisher |
ACHARYA N. G. RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY
|
|