STUDIES ON THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF MODIFIED SINGLE SEED DESCENT BREEDING PROCEDURES IN SESAME (Sesamum indicum L.)
KrishiKosh
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
STUDIES ON THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF MODIFIED SINGLE SEED DESCENT BREEDING PROCEDURES IN SESAME (Sesamum indicum L.)
|
|
Creator |
SOMANADHAM, PANUGANTI
|
|
Contributor |
ANANTHASAYANA, K
|
|
Subject |
EFFICIENCY,PROCEDURES,DESCENT,BREEDING,MODIFIED
|
|
Description |
Modified SSD procedures viz., single capsule descent - Bottom (BSCD), single capsule descent Middle (MSCD), single capsule descent - Top (TSCD) and single capsule descent - General (GSCD) were evaluated in three crosses of sesame namely, (GS-12 x TC-25) AT- 1, PDP-1-2 x JLT-2 and RCR-3 x Vinayak (M) to study the relative differences among the procedures. Sign.ificant differences among the F5 progenies in all the procedures of crosses were observed for seed yield and majority of yield component characters like total number of capsules, number of productive capsules and number of primary branches. Among the procedures BSCD had exhibited superiority compared to other procedures in general followed characters. by by recording higher mean GSCD procedure for However, relatively TSCD procedures were inferior for and variability majority of the MSCD and ingeneral majority of the characters studied. The comparison of method means across the crosses for yield and yield attributes revealed that BSCD was superior. Further, when method means were considered cross-wise, BSCD still maintained superiority followed by GSCD procedure for majority of the characters studied. Though MSCD had an edge over the crosses for some of the characters when considered cross-wise, it was superior only in cross II. In general, across the crosses as well as cross-wise,TSCD procedure observed to be ineffective for yield and yield attributes. Besides the mean values when the best line and top· few lines were considered, still BSCD procedure maintained its superiority for majority of the characters. GSCD procedure also retained bet~er lines specially in cross I and cross III for some characters. MSCD procedure was better in general in cross II for yield and some of the yield ·component characters. However, compared ·with the other crosses MSCD procedure was not appreciable. The lines derived from TSCD procedure were not promising for seed yield and majority of the yield component characters studied in any cross when compared to the lines of other procedures |
|
Date |
2016-08-09T10:51:36Z
2016-08-09T10:51:36Z 1989 |
|
Type |
Thesis
|
|
Identifier |
http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/71675
|
|
Language |
en
|
|
Relation |
D3197;
|
|
Format |
application/pdf
|
|
Publisher |
ACHARYA N.G. RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, RAJENDRANAGAR HYDERABAD
|
|