In silico analyses of genomes and proteomes of extremophiles in quest of novel survival strategies
EPrints@IICB
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
In silico analyses of genomes and proteomes of extremophiles in quest of novel survival strategies |
|
Creator |
Paul, Sandip
|
|
Subject |
Structural Biology & Bioinformatics
|
|
Description |
Life! It exists everywhere on our planet - from the poles to the equator, from submarine hydrothermal vents to frozen glaciers at the mountain tops, from dry valleys to wet marshlands, from acid springs to alkaline pools. Over the last 3.7 billion years or so, living organisms have adapted themselves to almost every environment imaginable – thanks to the process of evolution. The ability to adapt to varying environments, even the extreme or adverse ones, is a hallmark of life – it’s only because of this ability that the spectacular diversity gracing the present-day living world could have arisen! It is worth mentioning at this point that the word adaption has different meanings in everyday language and in evolutionary biology. In common language, adapting often means changing an individual’s behavior or characteristics to suit the circumstances. But in evolutionary biology, the term adaption has a precise and different meaning. In evolution, to adapt means to experience natural selection that improves the function of a trait in a specific environment and/or life-style. The process of evolutionary adaptation is the one experienced by whole populations over many generations, not the changes occurring in an individual organism over the course of its lifetime - a process often referred to as the phenotypic plasticity. While the phenotypic plasticity in individuals are not, in general, associated with any heritable changes at its gene or protein level, the process of adaptive evolution often imprint its signatures at the genome and/or proteome levels of the organisms. And, the primary objective of the present dissertation was to identify such imprints or macromolecular basis of adaptive evolution of microorganisms thriving at certain extreme/specialized environments, namely high temperature, high salinity or varying light intensities. Emphasis has also been given to a case of obligatory parasitism/symbiosis in the archaeal domain. Through the current study, an attempt has, therefore, been made to shed light on the process of microbial evolution occurring at widely varying scales and directions. The studies on halophiles and hyperthermophiles presented respectively in chapters 3 and 4 have demonstrated the process of convergent macro-evolution taken place on a scale that transcends the boundaries of a single species, a single phylum, or even a single domain. In both cases, extensive comparative analyses of various macromolecular traits of extremophiles and non-extremophiles from archaeal as well as bacterial domain have been carried out in order to remove any phylogenetic influence. Also Concluding Remarks ~ 145 ~ comparison have made among organisms with similar genomic G+C-content to minimize the variations arising from mutational bias of the species under study. The chapter 5 focuses on the reverse situation, i.e., the process of divergent microevolution that resulted in remarkable genotypic and phenotypic diversities in different strains/ecotypes of the same species, namely the cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus marinus – each specialized to dwell in different conditions of light, temperature and nutrient abundances. Interestingly enough, mutation, selection & genetic drift, the principal driving forces of evolution, have manifested themselves at both macro & micro levels through an assortment of different mechanisms- into an array of diverse niche-specific trends. It is worth mentioning at this point that mutation is a random process, but selection is not. Novel genetic traits emerge within a population because of random and spontaneous mutations - but selection acts on those traits in highly non-random way. Two entirely different populations of halophilic microbes of widely varying taxonomy and geographical locations at different points of time independently might select for higher usage of Asp or lower usage of Cys, probably because such selections would help them enhancing the protein flexibility in high salt concentration, while their hyperthermophilic relatives would prefer to have higher usage of Lys and Tyr, as these would help them to stabilize their proteins at higher temperatures by enhancing the cation-pi interactions. Thus, two taxonomically, spatially and temporally distant populations may gradually acquire similar genomic and/or proteomic traits, if they intend to thrive at similar ecological niches, while two populations of same species, when acclimatize to differential environmental conditions like distinct light optima, may exhibit adaptive radiations through selection of conspicuous traits - starting at the genomic level. Therefore, various types of extremophiles may evolve under the influence of mutation, selection & genetic drift - it is only through appropriate variations in selection criteria that novel molecular strategies emerge, facilitating their survival in diverse ecological niches. And, here lies the unity amongst the diversity of the living world. |
|
Date |
2009
|
|
Type |
Thesis
NonPeerReviewed |
|
Format |
application/pdf
|
|
Identifier |
http://www.eprints.iicb.res.in/389/1/Thesis_Sandip_Paul.pdf
Paul, Sandip (2009) In silico analyses of genomes and proteomes of extremophiles in quest of novel survival strategies. PhD thesis, Jadavpur University. |
|
Relation |
http://www.eprints.iicb.res.in/389/
|
|