Efficacy of various grain protectants against pulse beetle, callosobruchus chinensis (L.) infesting pigeonpea, cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp
KrishiKosh
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
Efficacy of various grain protectants against pulse beetle, callosobruchus chinensis (L.) infesting pigeonpea, cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp
|
|
Creator |
Vijaykumar Jangamashetti
|
|
Contributor |
Singal, Shiv K.
|
|
Subject |
Pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis, Pigeonpea Cajanus cajan, Grain protectants
|
|
Description |
Pigeonpea Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. is one of the most important pulse crop cultivated in India. It is next only to chickpea in area and production among all the pulse crops grown in India. Pulses also constitute the main source of protein in developing countries like India, where per capita consumption of animal protein is very low. Pulses can be stored for considerable periods of times after harvest but during storage they may be attacked by various insect species. Among these the most important one is pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) mainly in pigeonpea. Synthetic pesticides played a significant role in restricting problems and were also cost effective. However, these chemical insecticides pose several problems like residual toxicity and health hazards to the consumers as well as users. The present investigations were carried out to study the effectiveness of grain protectants i.e. neem seed kernel powder @ 20g/kg, neem oil @ 10ml/kg, mustard oil @ 7.5 ml/kg, groundnut oil @ 7.5 ml/kg, turmeric powder @ 3.5g/kg, mustard oil + turmeric powder @ 3.75 ml + 1.75 g/kg, groundnut oil + turmeric powder @ 3.75 ml + 1.75g/kg, saw dust (7cm covering), sand (7cm covering), dung cake ash (7cm covering) and wheat husk (7cm covering) against C. chinensis and their effect on quality of pigeonpea seed variety Manak. There were a total of 12 treatments and each treatment was replicated thrice including untreated seeds as control and kept in plastic jars. All the grain protectants except wheat husk, neem seed kernel powder and turmeric powder proved to be more effective as compared to untreated control for causing mortality of C. chinensis adults. As the storage periods of treated seed increased, the mortality of adults decreased. All the grain protectants except wheat husk and neem seed kernel powder proved to be most effective as compared to untreated control in reducing number of egg laid after 1, 45, 90 and 135 days of storage, respectively. On the basis of number of adult emergence and per cent seed damage, all the grain protectants except three protectants i.e. neem seed kernel powder, turmeric powder and wheat husk treatments were highly effective and no adult emerged from saw dust, sand, dung cake ash and neem oil treatments at all storage intervals of 1, 45, 90 and 135 days of storage. This group followed by mustard oil + turmeric powder, groundnut oil + turmeric powder, mustard oil and groundnut oil proved to be the most effective and next effective group of grain protectants, respectively. None of the treatments had any adverse effect on standard germination which was above the prescribed Indian seed certification standards for pigeonpea seeds. Dung cake ash and turmeric powder treatments had adverse effect on seedling vigour index when compare to all other treatments. |
|
Date |
2016-11-28T12:49:07Z
2016-11-28T12:49:07Z 2007 |
|
Type |
Thesis
|
|
Identifier |
http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/87826
|
|
Language |
en
|
|
Format |
application/pdf
|
|
Publisher |
CCSHAU
|
|