Record Details

DSpace at CIFT

View Archive Info
 

Metadata

 
Field Value
 
Title Performance Evaluation of Turtle Excluder Device off Dhamra in Bay of Bengal
 
Names Prakash, R.R.
Boopendranath, M. R.
Vinod, M.
Date Issued 2016 (iso8601)
Abstract Fishery Technology
Journal Help
User
Username
Password
Remember me
Notifications

View
Subscribe

Journal Content
Search
Search Scope

Browse

By Issue
By Author
By Title
Other Journals

Font Size
Make font size smaller
Make font size default
Make font size larger

Keywords Cryopreservation, brown trout, activator, cryo diluent, extender, milt Frozen storage, tripolyphosphate, blanching, quality changes, green mussel, Pema viridis Gross Energy Requirement India K value, biogenic amines, demerit scoring, nucleotides Labeo rohita Macrobrachium rosenbergii Macrobrachium rosenbergii, male morphotypes, developmental pathways Otter boards, construction cost Seaweed, Caulerpa racemosa, cytokinin, bioassay, kinetin Shrimp waste, alkaline proteinase, solvent-tolerance Streptomyces, physiological characteristics, systematics, new taxon Vembanad lake Vibrio cholerae Non 01, Mangalore coast, temperature, dispersion, pH, salinity bycatch fish production growth leaching oxidative stress selectivity survival
Information

For Readers
For Authors
For Librarians

Home About Login Register Search Current Archives Announcements SOFTI

Home > Vol 53, No 3 (2016) > Prakash
Performance Evaluation of Turtle Excluder Device off Dhamra in Bay of Bengal
R. Raghu Prakash, M. R. Boopendranath, M. Vinod

Abstract

Turtles are endangered and protected species under
the Indian Wildlife Protection Act 1972. A number
of non-target resources, such as sea turtles, are
caught during trawling. This study reports the field
trials conducted using TED-installed fish trawls in
Odisha waters to evaluate the efficacy of TED. The
incidence of sea turtles was one for every 15 hauls
and the turtle excluder device (CIFT-TED) showed
100% exclusion for the sea turtle entering the trawl
system. The exclusion rates were 2.5% for the total
catch and 2.7% for the shrimp. Twenty eight species
of finfish were encountered during the trials of
which 17 were represented in the excluded portion
of the catch.
Genre Article
Identifier Fiishery Technology 2016:53(3), 183-189