Record Details

Fishery and biology of penaeid prawn Parapenaeopsis maxillipedo Alcock along Chennai (Madras) coast

CMFRI Repository

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Relation http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/140/
 
Title Fishery and biology of penaeid prawn Parapenaeopsis
maxillipedo Alcock along Chennai (Madras) coast
 
Creator Thangaraj Subramanian, V
 
Subject Prawn and Prawn fisheries
Biology
 
Description Parapenaeopsis maxillipedo supported a steadily increasing fishery along the
Chennai coast with the average annual catch of 326 t at the catch rate of 1.40
kg/hr contributing 11.8% of prawn landings in 1990-'99. The catches were more
abundant in June-September and poor in summer months of April-May. Females
were relatively more in number and larger in size. The overall sex-ratio for 1992-
'95 was 65.9 : 34.1% in favour of females. The length weight relationship was:
Ln W = -3.9469 + 2.7077 Ln L for male and Ln W = -4.3493 + 2.8914 Ln L for
female. The growth factors were: L°° = 108.0 mm and K = 2.61/year for males
L°° = 117.8 mm and K = 2.21/year for females. The species had a short life span
and only small fraction of the population could survive in the second year of life.
Higher recruitment was recorded during February-March, June and September-
October which was apparently linked to the greatbi spawning spells during June,
October and February. The mortality rates were : Z = 7.4713, M = 4.3728 and
F = 3.0985 for males and Z = 8.6939, M = 3.8301 and F = 4.8638 for females.
These estimates gave an average exploitation rate of 0.49, that, with MSY of 304.7
t against the average catch of 326.4 t, indicated that the species had been in the
level of optimum fishing intensity during the study period.
 
Publisher CMFRI/ICAR
 
Date 2000
 
Type Article
PeerReviewed
 
Format application/pdf
 
Language en
 
Identifier http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/140/1/Article_05.pdf
Thangaraj Subramanian, V (2000) Fishery and biology of penaeid prawn Parapenaeopsis maxillipedo Alcock along Chennai (Madras) coast. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 47 (3). pp. 175-184.