Record Details

<p>Comparison of the energy consumption in traditional and advanced paddy residue management technologies for wheat sowing</p>

Online Publishing @ NISCAIR

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Authentication Code dc
 
Title Statement <p>Comparison of the energy consumption in traditional and advanced paddy residue management technologies for wheat sowing</p>
 
Added Entry - Uncontrolled Name DHANGER, PARVEEN ; Haryana Agricultural University
Jain, Mukesh ; COAE&T, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125 004
Rani, Vijya ; COAE&T, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125 004
Kumar, Hemant ; COAE&T, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125 004
Jaideep, Jaideep ; COAE&T, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125 004
Mor, Aman ; COAE&T, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125 004
Sachin, Sachin ; COAE&T, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125 004
 
Uncontrolled Index Term Energy, Incorporation, Straw management, Tillage practice, Wheat sowing
 
Summary, etc. <p>The study examines the energy consumption for paddy harvesting and wheat sowing using different techniques. The research was planned with ten treatments using three straw management practices, i.e., Retention, Incorporation, and Removal of straw. Major portion of energy is consumed in form of diesel energy, which was the highest energy consumption source, with a participation of 79.3 to 86.5%. It was resulted that T<sub>4</sub> had the opulent while T<sub>7</sub> had the miserable yield. Least energy was consumed in treatment T<sub>2</sub> (1582.9 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>) and the most was in treatment T<sub>5</sub> (3500.4 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>). The specific energy consumption was 25.47, 24.94, 27.74, 49.68, 58.15, 46.60, 55.82, 51.43, 53.01 and 37.78 MJ ha<sup>-1</sup>, respectively for Treatment T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, T<sub>3</sub>, T<sub>4</sub>, T<sub>5</sub>, T<sub>6</sub>, T<sub>7</sub>, T<sub>8</sub>, T<sub>9</sub>, and T<sub>10</sub>. Specific energy is more in removal and incorporation of straw residue practices in comparison to residue retention practices. It can be concluded that treatments using direct drilling machine was the most efficient in case of specific energy consumption. Residue retention tillage practice with happy seeder should be used to make higher productivity with efficient energy input to manage paddy residue.</p>
 
Publication, Distribution, Etc. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge (IJTK)
2021-08-18 15:09:53
 
Electronic Location and Access application/pdf
http://op.niscair.res.in/index.php/IJTK/article/view/33276
 
Data Source Entry Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge (IJTK); ##issue.vol## 20, ##issue.no## 3 (2021): Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge
 
Language Note en