Biometry, length-weight and length-length relationships of flathead sillago Sillaginopsis panijus (Hamilton, 1822) (Perciformes: Sillaginidae) from the north-western Bay of Bengal
CMFRI Repository
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Relation |
http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/14692/
http://epubs.icar.org.in/ejournal/index.php/IJF/article/view/95369 DOI: 10.21077/ijf.2020.67.3.95369-16 |
|
Title |
Biometry, length-weight and length-length relationships of flathead sillago Sillaginopsis panijus (Hamilton, 1822) (Perciformes: Sillaginidae) from the north-western Bay of Bengal |
|
Creator |
Pradhan, Suraj Kumar
Roul, Subal Kumar Ghosh, Shubhadeep Tripathy, Pritam Jaiswar, A K Bhusan, Sashi Nayak, B B |
|
Subject |
Fish biology
Fish and Fisheries |
|
Description |
Biometry, length-weight relationships (LWRs) and length-length relationships (LLRs) of Sillaginopsis panijus (Hamilton, 1822) were investigated in the Indian coast of north-western Bay of Bengal. Altogether 622 specimens were collected between August 2018 and September 2019 from landings by trawls (30-35 mm mesh size), gillnets (15-55 mm mesh size) and shore seines (7-15 mm bag mesh size). The total length and weight of the specimens ranged from 7.8-40.3 cm and 2.9-506 g, respectively. The LWR established was W=0.0048 L3.059 for males, W=0.0032 L3.185 for females and W=0.0047 L3.0645 for indeterminates, indicating positive allometric growth pattern. All the LWRs were highly significant (p |
|
Date |
2020
|
|
Type |
Article
PeerReviewed |
|
Format |
text
|
|
Language |
en
|
|
Identifier |
http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/14692/1/IJF_2020_Subal%20Kumar%20Roul_Biometry%20length-weight%20and%20length-length%20relationships%20of%20flathead%20sillago.pdf
Pradhan, Suraj Kumar and Roul, Subal Kumar and Ghosh, Shubhadeep and Tripathy, Pritam and Jaiswar, A K and Bhusan, Sashi and Nayak, B B (2020) Biometry, length-weight and length-length relationships of flathead sillago Sillaginopsis panijus (Hamilton, 1822) (Perciformes: Sillaginidae) from the north-western Bay of Bengal. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 67 (3). pp. 144-151. |
|