Annual Report
KRISHI: Publication and Data Inventory Repository
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
Annual Report
Not Available |
|
Creator |
Director
|
|
Subject |
Not Available
|
|
Description |
Not Available
The National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NCAP) is making persistent efforts to sustain excellence in agricultural economics and policy research in the country. The Centre serves as a policy think tank and helps the ICAR through credible research to actively participate in policy debates and decisions and in monitoring and interpreting the research impacts at various levels. The Centre sensitizes policy planners in the country and ICAR about the emerging changes and concerns related to agriculture and farmers. Besides helping ICAR, the Centre also provides policy inputs to several other public sector organisations, Departments, Ministries and various state governments. The staff of the Centre included 20 scientists, 18 other staff members and the research project staff in the year 2012-13. The total expenditure of the Centre, including externally funded projects, during the year was Rs 673 lakh. A Research Advisory Committee, chaired by Prof. V S Vyas, distinguished economist and Member, Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, guides the Centre in its research programmes, and a Management Committee guides its overall functioning. Besides, a number of committees (mandated by ICAR and internal) facilitate decentralised management of the Centre. Research is conducted at the Centre under five broad themes, viz. technology policy, sustainable agricultural systems, markets and trade, institutional change and agricultural growth and modelling. During the year 2012- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13, the Centre undertook 14 research projects and completed five consultancy research studies. It has not only maintained but also increased the linkages and collaborations with many institutions in India and abroad. Besides, it organised a number of workshops, trainings, brainstorming sessions and policy discussions. A brief account of research and other activities undertaken by the Centre during 2012-13 is given below. ● The study on research priority setting compared existing and normative allocation of agricultural research resources across major states of the country and suggested increase in share of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Bihar, West Bengal, Odisha, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand. The proposed reallocation of resources shows large reduction in shares of Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Punjab, Haryana, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Assam, and all hill states to varying degree. Interestingly, the states which gain in proposed allocation except West Bengal are in the development stage of agriculture. ● In a study on district-wise agricultural productivity, striking variations were observed across districts. Barmer remained the lowest productive district in TE 2007 with Rs. 2068/ha and Karnal recorded the highest productivity of Rs. 107376/ha. The role of modern inputs, viz. improved seed, fertilizer, pesticides and mechanization, in fostering growth in agricultural productivity was clearly visible in the study. xvi ● Another study concluded that agricultural R&D for less-developed countries is at crossroads. The technology gap between the developed and the developing countries is increasing, both quantitatively as well as qualitatively. If the current R&D dichotomies continue, it may dispatch agriculture in many developing countries to technological orphanage. ● Another study examined the varietal diversity and identified dominant varieties of chickpea in Madhya Pradesh. It was found that 63.22 per cent of the net sown area was under chickpea, out of which onethird area was under Kabuli type chickpea and two-third of chickpea area was under non-Kabuli. Lack of availability of seeds of modern varieties is one of the main constraints to their adoption. ● Use of appropriate information and inputs at required time has brought more efficient ways of production and sale of produce. To harness the full potential of mobile and to pave the way for m-agriculture (Mobile based agriculture), awareness cum training programs need to be organized to encourage farmers in accessing information on weather and agricultural technologies. Mobile applications in agriculture using local languages will be highly beneficial. ● Comparative cost-return structure of baby corn with respect to other crops revealed that baby corn cultivation can improve the livelihood security of the farm families to a great extent by providing net returns of Rs 68,725/acre. Reduction in marketing margin and increase in share of farmers in consumer price has the scope to raise profitability of baby corn manifolds. ● Another study indicated positive relationship between access of farm women to information and communication technologies (ICTs) and farm size. ICTs had helped farm women in selling their farm produce, especially vegetables, at competitive market rates and facilitated adoption of improved technologies for vegetables production. The important drivers identified affecting farm women’s access to ICTs are: education, income, structure of the family and caste. ● Kerala’s economy is transforming from an agrarian one to a heavily service oriented one. The level of self-sufficiency of the state on its staple food, rice was found to be just 17 per cent, and that on pulses was less than 1 per cent. The future projections on supply-demand balance of most of the food commodities indicate further aggravation of the already well articulated concern of Kerala touching the worst levels of food self-sufficiency, if existing trends continue for long. ● IPM is effectively used in about 3-5% of net sown area and bio-pesticides account for only 2.89% of the pesticides sales in the country. Greater integration of research, education, extension and programs (policies) for IPM is emphasized. ● Plant protection and seed replacement rates were identified as the major constraints to increasing pulse production. The major research activity is to develop and test pulse varieties suitable for different agroecosystems in the country. ● Trends in the monthly temperature in different agro-ecologies of India were assessed for the period 1901-2002. In general, it emerged that Indian winters are becoming hotter. There was a statistically significant rise (1 C to 1.5 C) in the temperature in most of the months during October-April. ● The drought index was constructed for each district (1970 base districts) for the kharif season. During the 1970s and 1980s xvii droughts were less frequent but were more widespread. These, however, became more frequent during the 1990s and 2000s, but less widespread. ● Panel data on area and production of 19 major crops for 200 districts (at 1970 base) for the period 1969-2005 were used to assess the impact of climate change on agricultural productivity. At all-India level, 1 degree rise in temperature could cause a reduction in agricultural productivity by 12-13 per cent until the early 1990s. The effect, however, became stronger (15.5%) afterwards. ● Technology adoption and improvement in efficiency in production are important strategies to raise agricultural production and to improve food and nutritional security. Large variations in the efficiency were found across agro-ecologies. The highest technical efficiency was observed in case of hill and mountainous region and the lowest in the case of rainfed region. The findings of the study revealed significant positive role of education, infrastructure and durable capital assets in improving the technical efficiency. ● SAARC countries have moved further to liberalize trade and investment in the region and they have signed “South Asia Free Trade Agreement” in January 2004. The major factor for low volume and low share of intra-regional trade seems to be the poor trade facilitation for intra-regional trade, like efficiency of custom, other border procedures, quality of transport and IT infrastructure etc. Liberal and conducive environment for FDIs in the area of food chain development and food processing and more liberal trade will not only raise intra-regional trade but also help in addressing food deficit in SAARC countries. ● The Karnataka State Agricultural Marketing Board has started disseminating agricultural prices to the farming community through free mobile SMS, which has made farmers save marketing time and reduced cost of search of information. ● The super markets are adopting direct marketing models with backward linkages saving farmers from market cost, other charges and complete elimination of middlemen. Farmers supplying to super markets have advantages getting technical guidance, market information on prices, perfect weights, spot payments etc. ● The relationship between poverty and livestock income showed that the head count poverty is negatively and significantly associated with income from livestock as well as crops. The marginal effect of livestock on poverty reduction is -0.36 against -0.25 for crops, implying that growth in the livestock sector has a larger impact on poverty reduction. ● The productivity of meat animals such as sheep, goats and pigs in India is substantially less compared to world averages. There was a sharp deceleration in the yield growth of dairy animals. The growth in milk yield of crossbred cows decelerated from 1.8% during the 1990s to 0.7% during the 2000s and of buffaloes from 1.7% to 1.2%. The productivity of meat animals (sheep, goats and pigs) has remained stagnant for quite long. ● The role of PDS in meeting the consumption requirement of households has increased over time. In general, the penetration of PDS has increased in almost all states of country over time and the share of PDS grain in household food consumption has increased. The findings suggest that the PDS has proved to be one of the most effective instruments of government policy over the xviii years in stabilizing of foodgrain prices and making their availability to consumers at affordable price. ● Another study estimated the risk involved in production of various crops at disaggregate and aggregate level. Agricultural insurance schemes launched in the country have served the farmers in a limited way only. Valued-added services like weather forecasts, agro-advisories could be bundled with crop insurance, for popularizing crop insurance and concrete action is required from the government, in terms of a suitable law, like ‘agriculture risk protection act’, etc. ● Growth rate of agriculture has improved considerably after 2004-05. Growth rate in Net State Domestic Product (NSDP)- Agriculture in six out of 20 major states was higher than the national target. These states are Gujarat, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and Jharkhand. One fifth states are close to the national target of 4% growth rate in agriculture. States of Kerala, UP, Uttarakhand and J&K achieved less than 2 per cent growth in agriculture sector during 2001 to 2011. ● Estimates of undernutrition (calorie deficiency) and malnutrition (protein deficiency) were prepared for various income groups using unit-level NSSO data. The average intake levels of poor households were at levels even lower than the FAO norm of 1800 Kcal. Calorie deficiency was higher for rural areas than urban areas. More than half of the income poor population was found to be calorie deficient in both rural and urban areas across all the choices of norms. Incidence of undernutrition and malnutrition was much higher based on ICMR-NIN norm. It was also observed that the percentage of population with inadequate protein intakes was higher in urban households as compared to their rural counterparts. ● The patterns of calorie as well as protein intake do not depict a clear trend for both rural and urban households. Between 1983 to 2009-10, the calorie and protein consumption has declined in the rural areas and increased in the urban areas. The consumption of fat consistently increased overtime both in rural and urban areas. ● Technology had been the main source of agricultural growth in the 1980s. Diversification (from lower-value to highervalue crops) was the second largest source of growth (26%); followed by area expansion (17%). Later, there was also a sharp increase in the contribution of prices to growth mainly because of terms of trade in favor of agriculture. Diversification, on the other hand, consolidated its share in agriculture growth. There was also a sharp increase in the contribution of prices to growth mainly because of terms of trade in favor of agriculture. In the 2000s, the contribution of prices declined drastically suggesting that price-led growth cannot sustain in the long-run. ● The centre organized two one-week training programme on ‘core issues in the agricultural sector’ for the officers of the Indian Economic Service’ funded by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India. The centre also conducted a training programme on Field Survey, Electronic Compilation and Analysis of Data for the field staff of ICAR-ICRISAT project on Tracking Change in Rural Poverty in Household and Village Economies in South Asia. Besides, the Centre conducted several theme/project-wise trainings, interaction meetings, workshops, etc. which helped in capacity building of the project partners. xix ● As part of the dissemination of research output, the Centre published one policy paper during the year under report. The staff of the Centre published 20 research papers in leading journals of national and international repute and contributed 11 book chapters/ popular articles. More than 15 presentations were made in national and international conferences. The scientists of the Centre were involved in a number of professional and policy interactions and projects. The website of NCAP (www.ncap.res.in) was regularly updated and all the publications of the Centre were uploaded on the website. ● Faculty of the Centre participated in several policy debates and discourses and also undertook research based policy advocacy. NCAP faculty has played a leading role in creating proper understanding and awareness among public on various agricultural issues through participation in T.V. debates and newspaper reporting. Director NCAP has been a resource person for SAARC, G-20 and couple of other international bodies besides responding to needs of Department of Agriculture and Cooperation (DAC), Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Commerce. Not Available |
|
Date |
2016-12-01T06:49:38Z
2016-12-01T06:49:38Z 2013-07-01 |
|
Type |
Annual Report
|
|
Identifier |
Not Available
Not Available http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/753 |
|
Language |
English
|
|
Relation |
2012-13;
|
|
Publisher |
Not Available
|
|