Tuna drift gillnet fishery at Chennai, Tamil Nadu- an update
CMFRI Repository
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Relation |
http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/14242/
http://mbai.org.in/php/journaldload.php?id=2520&bkid=123 doi:10.6024/jmbai.2019.61.2.2066-06 |
|
Title |
Tuna drift gillnet fishery at Chennai, Tamil Nadu- an update |
|
Creator |
Sivadas, M
Abdussamad, E M Margaret Muthu Rathinam, A Mohan, S Vasu, P Laxmilatha, P |
|
Subject |
Tuna fisheries
Crafts & Gear |
|
Description |
The present study describes the status of multiday drift gillnet fishery for tuna from Chennai fishing harbour based on data for the years 2016 – 2017. The data is also compared with that during 1999- 2006. Both the craft and gear increased in size with consequent extension of fishing grounds and increase in the number of days/ fishing trip. The size of the boats increased to 20-23 m OAL from 11-12 m OAL and weight of the gear from 1 to more than 6 t. Annual average catch increased to 8523 t during 2016-2017 from 595 t during 1999-2006. Average catch per unit effort was 8310 kg as against 730 kg during 1999-2006. Yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares and Skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis were the dominant species. The stock position of skipjack tuna and yellowfin tuna vis-àvis the three indicators indicated that the percentage of mature yellowfin tuna in the catch in 2017 was 68%, fish in optimum length 35% and mega-spawners 33% whereas in skipjack tuna the respective percentages were 99.5, 21.1 and 79.1. Problems and prospects of multiday tuna drift gillnet fishery are also discussed. |
|
Publisher |
MBAI, Cochin-14
|
|
Date |
2019
|
|
Type |
Article
PeerReviewed |
|
Format |
text
|
|
Language |
en
|
|
Identifier |
http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/14242/1/JMBAI_2019_Sivadas%20M_Tuna%20drift%20gillnet%20fishery%20at%20Chennai%2C%20Tamil%20Nadu.pdf
Sivadas, M and Abdussamad, E M and Margaret Muthu Rathinam, A and Mohan, S and Vasu, P and Laxmilatha, P (2019) Tuna drift gillnet fishery at Chennai, Tamil Nadu- an update. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 61 (2). pp. 41-46. |
|