Record Details

Efficiency of Three-Stone Fire and Improved Cooking Stoves using on-farm and off-farm fuels in semi-arid Tanzania

CGSpace

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Efficiency of Three-Stone Fire and Improved Cooking Stoves using on-farm and off-farm fuels in semi-arid Tanzania
 
Creator Hafner, Johannes M.
Uckert, Götz
Hoffmann, H.K.
Rosenstock, Todd S.
Sieber, S.
Kimaro, Anthony A.
 
Subject bioenergy
charcoal
 
Description In Tanzania, fuelwood availability for cooking is an increasing challenge for rural households struggling to meet this need. Here, a possible pathway for smallholder farmers to reduce their dependency on off-farm fuelwood is evaluated. We compare the cooking performance of on-farm produced fuels, like wood from Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp. and Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. (pigeon pea stalks) with the off-farm fuelwood species Mimusops obtusifolia (Lam. Sapotaceae). Fuel performance was tested using Three-Stone Fire stoves and artisan-made Improved Cooking Stoves. We conducted 75 cooking tasks, cooking a standardized pre-defined meal with two pots in five villages in Chamwino and Kongwa districts, Dodoma region. The Controlled Cooking Test design assessed four key performance indicators: (1) time until water is boiling in pot A, (2) time until food item in pot A is ready to be consumed, (3) total cooking time per meal, including food items in pots A and B, (4) total fuel consumption per meal, including food items in pots A and B. Compared to the off-farm fuel, on-farm fuels perform better across the four key performance indicators. The results show that with regard to total cooking time per meal, including food items in pots A and B and total fuel consumption per meal, including food items in pots A and B, Improved Cooking Stoves used less time and fuel than Three-Stone Fire stoves. Regarding the key performance indicators time until water is boiling in pot A and time until food item in pot A is ready to be consumed, Three-Stone Fire stoves are faster than Improved Cooking Stoves, thus suggesting that Three-Stone Fire stoves are beneficial when cooking with only one pot. In order to reduce fuel and time consumption during cooking, the results suggest switching from off-farm to on-farm fuels; however, the choice of stove will depend on the cooking task performed.
 
Date 2020-12
2021-04-21T09:12:55Z
2021-04-21T09:12:55Z
 
Type Journal Article
 
Identifier Hafner, J.M., Uckert, G., Hoffmann, H.K., Rosenstock, T.S., Sieber, S. and Kimaro, A.A., 2020. Efficiency of Three-Stone Fire and Improved Cooking Stoves using on-farm and off-farm fuels in semi-arid Tanzania. Energy for Sustainable Development, 59, 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.10.012
0973-0826
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113482
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082620303215/pdfft?md5=5c793d1cc74a8868e6601bb1ea296ea7&pid=1-s2.0-S0973082620303215-main.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.10.012
 
Language en
 
Rights CC-BY-4.0
Open Access
 
Format 199-207
 
Publisher Elsevier BV
 
Source Energy for Sustainable Development