Reply on the comments on When is Statistical Significance not Significant?
Harvard Dataverse (Africa Rice Center, Bioversity International, CCAFS, CIAT, IFPRI, IRRI and WorldFish)
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
Reply on the comments on When is Statistical Significance not Significant?
|
|
Identifier |
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/27162
|
|
Creator |
Figueiredo Filho, Dalson
Rocha, Enivaldo Paranhos, Ranulfo |
|
Publisher |
Harvard Dataverse
|
|
Description |
In this article we reply to Silva and Guarnieri (2014) comments on Figueiredo Filho et al (2013) paper published by the Brazilian Political Science Review. Originally, we developed four recommendations: (1) scholars must always graphically analyze their data before interpreting the p-value; (2) it is pointless to estimate the p-value for non-random samples; (3) the p-value is highly affected by the sample size and (4) it is pointless to estimate the p-value when dealing with data on population. Here we defend our view about the proper use the p-value statistic and we use both observational and simulation data to make our case. Substantively, we hope to advance the debate about statistical significance in Political Science.
|
|