Time Enough for Safety: Comment on “The Complications of Controlling Agency Time Discretion: FDA Review Deadlines and Postmarket Drug Safety”
Harvard Dataverse (Africa Rice Center, Bioversity International, CCAFS, CIAT, IFPRI, IRRI and WorldFish)
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
Time Enough for Safety: Comment on “The Complications of Controlling Agency Time Discretion: FDA Review Deadlines and Postmarket Drug Safety”
|
|
Identifier |
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/27191
|
|
Creator |
Schick, Andreas
Lanthier, Michael Nardinelli, Clark |
|
Publisher |
Harvard Dataverse
|
|
Description |
Carpenter, Chattopadhyay, Moffitt, and Nall (2012) present results that suggest that time constraints on new-drug reviews are positively associated with post-market safety outcomes. However, their analysis omits obvious confounding variables, and their data set contains several clear errors. In regressions using a clean data set and plausible confounding variables, we find that the relationship between time constraints on new-drug reviews and post-market safety events is neither robust nor statistically significant.
|
|
Subject |
PDUFA Review Times Boxed Warnings Safety-Based Withdrawals Prescription Drug User Fee Act
|
|
Contributor |
Andreas Schick
|
|