Record Details

Replication Data for: Intrinsic Motivation in Public Service: Theory and Evidence from State Supreme Courts

Harvard Dataverse (Africa Rice Center, Bioversity International, CCAFS, CIAT, IFPRI, IRRI and WorldFish)

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Replication Data for: Intrinsic Motivation in Public Service: Theory and Evidence from State Supreme Courts
 
Identifier https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GVEU25
 
Creator Ash, Elliott
MacLeod, W Bentley
 
Publisher Harvard Dataverse
 
Description This paper provides a theoretical and empirical analysis of the intrinsic preferences of state appellate court judges. We construct a panel data set using published decisions from all state supreme courts from 1947 to 1994. We estimate the effects of changes in judge employment conditions on a number of measures of judicial performance. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that judges are intrinsically motivated to provide high-quality decisions, and that at the margin they prefer quality over quantity. When judges face less time pressure -- whether from the introduction of an intermediate appellate court, the weakening of electoral demands, or an increased judge salary -- they write more well-researched opinions that are cited more often by later judges. These effects are strongest when judges have more discretion to select their case portfolio.
 
Subject Law
Social Sciences
intrinsic incentives, judicial performance
 
Contributor MacLeod, W. Bentley