Record Details

Replication Data for: Decomposing Audience Costs: Bringing the Audience Back into Audience Cost Theory

Harvard Dataverse (Africa Rice Center, Bioversity International, CCAFS, CIAT, IFPRI, IRRI and WorldFish)

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Replication Data for: Decomposing Audience Costs: Bringing the Audience Back into Audience Cost Theory
 
Identifier https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WCH6ZH
 
Creator Kertzer, Joshua D.
Brutger, Ryan
 
Publisher Harvard Dataverse
 
Description According to a growing tradition in International Relations, one way governments can credibly signal their intentions in foreign policy crises is by creating domestic audience costs: leaders can tie their hands by publicly threatening to use force, since domestic publics punish leaders who say one thing and do another. We argue here that there are actually two logics of audience costs: audiences can punish leaders both for being inconsistent (the traditional audience cost), and for threatening to use force in the first place (a belligerence cost). We employ an experiment that disentangles these two rationales, and turn to a series of dispositional characteristics from political psychology to bring the audience back into audience cost theory. Our results suggest that traditional audience cost experiments may overestimate how much people care about inconsistency, and that the logic of audience costs (and the implications for crisis bargaining) varies considerably with the leader's constituency.
 
Subject Social Sciences
Audience cost theory
 
Contributor Joshua D. Kertzer