Record Details

Replication Data for: Democratization, Elections, and Public Goods: The Evidence from Deforestation

Harvard Dataverse (Africa Rice Center, Bioversity International, CCAFS, CIAT, IFPRI, IRRI and WorldFish)

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Replication Data for: Democratization, Elections, and Public Goods: The Evidence from Deforestation
 
Identifier https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EF7R0Z
 
Creator Sanford, Luke
 
Publisher Harvard Dataverse
 
Description This paper shows that over the last three decades competitive elections were associated with increased deforestation. Protection of forested areas provides long-term, public goods while their destruction provides short-term, private goods for particular voters. Politicians facing a competitive election offer voters access to forested areas mainly for small-scale farming or commercial use of timber in exchange for electoral support. I test this theory of political deforestation using satellite generated global forest cover data and the results of over 1000 national-level elections between 1982 and 2016. I find that countries which undergo a democratic transition lose an additional .8 percentage points of their forest cover each year, that years with close elections have over 1 percentage point per year higher forest cover loss compared to non-election years, and that as the margin of victory in an election decreases by 10 points the amount of deforestation increases by .7 percentage points per year. These increases are on the order of five to ten times the average rate of forest loss globally. This suggests democratization is associated with under-provision of environmental public goods and contested elections are partially responsible for this under-provision.
 
Subject Social Sciences
Environmental policy
Deforestation
Democracy
Elections
 
Contributor Sanford, Luke
 
Source Global Administrative Boundaries, accessed March 2018. https://gadm.org/



GADM maps and data. Accessed March 4, 2018. https://gadm.org/data.html



Global 0.05 decimal degree forest cover maps from 1982-2016
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0411-9



Hansen, M., X. Song. Vegetation Continuous Fields (VCF) Yearly Global 0.05 Deg. 2018, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/MEaSUREs/VCF/VCF5KYR.001. Accessed 2020-12-27.



Global Ecological Zones
http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/metadata.show?id=1255



Team, GeoNetwork. 2007. “GeoNetwork Opensource Portal to Spatial Data and Information.” InteractiveResource. Global. February 7, 2007. http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/metadata.show?id=1255.



PolityIV, accessed March 2018
https://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html



Marshall, Monty G., Ted Robert Gurr, Keith Jaggers. Polity IV Project. 2016. Distributed by Center for Systemic Peace. https://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm



Database of Political Institutions, accessed March 2018
https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/wps2283-database-political-institutions



Cruz, Cesi, Philip Keefer and Carlos Scartascini (2016). "Database of Political Institutions Codebook, 2015 Update (DPI2015)." Inter-American Development Bank. Updated version of Thorsten Beck, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh, 2001. "New tools in comparative political economy: The Database of Political Institutions." 15:1, 165-176 (September), World Bank Economic Review.



Varieties of Democracy, accessed March 2020
https://www.v-dem.net/en/



Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, M. Steven Fish, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Anna Lu ̈hrmann, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sig- man, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Steven Wilson, Agnes Cornell, Nazifa Alizada, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Garry Hindle, Nina Ilchenko, Laura Maxwell, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Johannes von R ̈omer, Aksel Sundstr ̈om, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2020. ”V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v10” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds20.



Pemstein, Daniel, Kyle L. Marquardt, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Juraj Medzihorsky, Joshua Krusell, Farhad Miri, and Johannes von R ̈omer. 2020. “The V-Dem Measurement Model: La- tent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data”. V-Dem Working Paper No. 21. 5th edition. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.



World Development Indicators, accessed March 2018
Codes: "NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS", "SL.AGR.EMPL.ZS", "SP.POP.GROW", "SP.POP.TOTL", "NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG", "NY.GDP.PCAP.KD"
https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators



World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C. March 4, 2018. :The World Bank. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators



International Political Economy Data Resource
https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/28003



Graham, Benjamin A.T.; Tucker, Jacob R., 2016, "The International Political Economy Data Resource", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/X093TV, Harvard Dataverse, V4