Record Details

Replication Data for: Campaign Messages, Polling, and Elections: Theory and Experimental Evidence

Harvard Dataverse (Africa Rice Center, Bioversity International, CCAFS, CIAT, IFPRI, IRRI and WorldFish)

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Replication Data for: Campaign Messages, Polling, and Elections: Theory and Experimental Evidence
 
Identifier https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/DAYSCX
 
Creator Feltovich, Nick
Giovannoni, Francesco
 
Publisher Harvard Dataverse
 
Description How do politicians' track records and campaign messaging interact and affect voters' welfare? We analyze this question, theoretically and experimentally. In the theoretical model, which we implement in the experiment, politicians choose how much of an economy's resources to allocate to the citizenry - keeping the remainder for themselves - then face re-election against a challenger. Both incumbents and challengers have private information about their own quality which determines the economy's level of resources. We vary whether candidates can send campaign messages, and the level of variability in candidates' quality. We observe that both higher quality variability and allowing campaigning benefit citizens by allowing them to better select and hold accountable higher-quality officials. Also, when incumbents have performed poorly or when quality variability is high, challengers' negative campaigning (criticizing the incumbent) increases, and incumbents' positive campaigning (emphasizing their own strengths) decreases.
 
Subject Social Sciences
Campaigning
Negative campaigns
Political economy
Cheap talk
Elections
Experiments
 
Contributor Feltovich, Nick