Record Details

Replication Data for: "Are there really two cultures? A pilot study on the application of qualitative and quantitative methods in political science"

Harvard Dataverse (Africa Rice Center, Bioversity International, CCAFS, CIAT, IFPRI, IRRI and WorldFish)

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Replication Data for: "Are there really two cultures? A pilot study on the application of qualitative and quantitative methods in political science"
 
Identifier https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ACUDFD
 
Creator Kuehn, David
Rohlfing, Ingo
 
Publisher Harvard Dataverse
 
Description In their 2012 publication A Tale of Two Cultures, Gary Goertz and James Mahoney argue that empirical research in the social sciences aiming at causal inference can be differentiated into a qualitative and a quantitative methodological culture. The two cultures differ fundamentally in how researchers approach and implement empirical studies. While the argument is well laid out and comprehensively illustrated, the empirical validity of the two cultures hypothesis has, thus far, not yet been evaluated systematically. This note introduces a research project that aims to test the two cultures hypothesis via an empirical analysis of how qualitative and quantitative methods are applied. In order to determine whether there is a qualitative and quantitative method culture, the researchers initially sampled 30 articles from three journals (Comparative Political Studies, European Journal of Political Research, World Politics) in the 2008–2012 period. Based on this dataset, no evidence was found for the existence of coherent systems of methods practices in political science.
 
Subject Social Sciences
 
Contributor Rohlfing, Ingo