Record Details

Replication Data for: When Do Voters Reward Overtly Religious Appeals?

Harvard Dataverse (Africa Rice Center, Bioversity International, CCAFS, CIAT, IFPRI, IRRI and WorldFish)

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Replication Data for: When Do Voters Reward Overtly Religious Appeals?
 
Identifier https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/JK4FMH
 
Creator McClendon, Gwyneth
Aldama, Abraham
 
Publisher Harvard Dataverse
 
Description Under what conditions do politicians make overtly religious appeals in front of mixed
secular-religious audiences? In the US context, other scholars have argued for the
strategic usefulness of multi-vocal appeals: religious politicians can use coded
language to win support from religious voters without losing support from secular ones. However, US politicians often use overtly religious language (uni-vocal appeals) in their communications to mixed audiences, at the risk of losing support from secular
voters. This pattern presents a puzzle that we address using a series of formal models
and a large online survey experiment. We argue that when religious-secular cleavages
are sensationalized, making religious voters see dangers in placating secular voters
(and vice versa), religious voters are more likely to reward overtly religious messages
and less likely to reward multivocal appeals. Under these conditions, religious
politicians become more likely to use overtly religious language in their political
messaging.
 
Subject Social Sciences
 
Date 2023-11-27
 
Contributor McClendon, Gwyneth