Record Details


Field	Value

Title	Replication Data for: "Partisan Governance and Minority Party Vetoes: Evidence from State Legislatures"

Identifier	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QKIK4U

Creator	Oldham, Robert

Publisher	Harvard Dataverse

Description	It is often argued that bipartisan lawmaking depends on minority legislative parties controlling institutional veto points through divided government and/or supermajority pivots. Using a new dataset of state legislative roll call votes on tax increases – an issue where states vary in whether they require majority or supermajority votes – I assess (1) whether minority control of veto points is necessary for bipartisan policymaking and (2) whether there are greater levels of partisan governance when the majority controls all veto points. I find that partisan governance is more likely when the majority controls all vetoes. However, bipartisan policymaking is still the most common outcome even when institutional conditions are seemingly ideal for partisan governance. Interviews with state policymakers uncover various non-institutional reasons for bipartisanship regardless of veto control. My findings suggest that while institutional rules can compel bipartisanship, they are just one of many reasons why the minority party participates in lawmaking.

Subject	Social Sciences Bipartisanship Policymaking Legislatures

Date	2024-03-04

Contributor	Oldham, Robert

ICAR Research Data Repository for Knowledge Management