Record Details

Replication data for: Responding to War on Capitol Hill: Battlefield Casualties, Congressional Response, and Public Support for the War in Iraq

Harvard Dataverse (Africa Rice Center, Bioversity International, CCAFS, CIAT, IFPRI, IRRI and WorldFish)

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Replication data for: Responding to War on Capitol Hill: Battlefield Casualties, Congressional Response, and Public Support for the War in Iraq
 
Identifier https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E9S0VN
 
Creator Kriner, Douglas
Shen, Francis
 
Publisher Harvard Dataverse
 
Description Recent scholarship argues that how members of Congress respond to an ongoing war significantly influences the president’s strategic calculations. However, the literature is comparably silent on the factors influencing the public positions members take during the course of a military venture. Accounting for both national and local electoral incentives, we develop a theory positing that partisanship conditions congressional responses to casualties in the aggregate, but that all members respond to casualties in their constituency by increasingly criticizing the war. Analyzing an original database of more than 7,500 content-coded House floor speeches on the Iraq War, we find strong support for both hypotheses. We also find that Democrats from high casualty constituencies were significantly more likely to cast anti-war roll call votes than their peers. Finally, we show that this significant variation in congressional anti-war position-taking strongly correlates with geographic differences in public support for war.
 
Subject Social Sciences
War
Congress
Public opinion
Casualties
Rhetoric
 
Contributor Douglas Kriner